[Wp4] Fwd: Re: [] Variety of formulation for Human Rights bylaw that were made. - corrected

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

Avri,

I am in full agreement with you.

We need something we can all live with in WS1 and can sort out the
casualties in WS2, if any.

el

On 2015-08-06 17:40, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In this case I think there may be a number of solutions that are
> right, especially when we remember all we are trying to do for WS1
> is to record a bylaws commitment to respect human rights in the
> work ICANN does.  We are not trying to solve all the complex of
> issues that we may want too bring up.  We need to find a way to
> just pick one.
> 
> I really think trying to wordsmith as simple a statement as
> possible is still out best alternative.
> 
> Though I can think of no better reason to miss our deadlines than
> a discussion of ICANN's Corporate responsibility to respect human
> rights, something I think I could work on forever, it would be
> nice if we didn't miss the deadline because of the discussion.
> But if we do miss the deadline, that's life.  We have seen that
> the sky does not fall when a deadline is missed.  And this is
> important.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 06-Aug-15 09:25, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> Avri,
>>
>> we need to get this right.
>>
>> We are not going to let the outcome dictated by arbitrary and
>> self imposed time frames.
>>
>> el
[...]