[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

[Samantha Eisner]

Question 1: No.  ICANN does not include references to other specific documents in its governing documents, particularly external documents that can be changed without ICANN’s consent or inputs.

Question 2: N/A

Question 3: N/A

From: <wp4-bounces at icann.org<mailto:wp4-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com<mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 5:10 PM
To: "wp4 at icann.org<mailto:wp4 at icann.org>" <wp4 at icann.org<mailto:wp4 at icann.org>>
Subject: [Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

All,

Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on the subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not.

Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 by replying to the WP4 list:


  *   Question 1 - Should there be a reference to
​a ​
specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights proposed by the CCWG (Yes or No)?
  *   Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the UDHR (yes or no)?
  *   Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should be referred to (list)?

Thank you.

Staff for Leon Sanchez.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151007/071de540/attachment-0001.html>