[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

[Greg Shatan]

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. None

Greg

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:

> Q1: no
> Q2: not only
> Q3: see Niels, but others could also be relevant
>
> best
>
> Jorge
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> Am 07.10.2015 um 02:13 schrieb Bernard Turcotte <
> turcotte.bernard at gmail.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> turcotte.bernard at gmail.com <javascript:;>>>:
>
> All,
>
> Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on the
> subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not.
>
> Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 by
> replying to the WP4 list:
>
>
>   *   Question 1 - Should there be a reference to
> ​a ​
> specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights proposed by
> the CCWG (Yes or No)?
>   *   Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the
> UDHR (yes or no)?
>   *   Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should be
> referred to (list)?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Staff for Leon Sanchez.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org <javascript:;><mailto:Wp4 at icann.org <javascript:;>>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org <javascript:;>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151007/56812840/attachment-0001.html>