[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I do not see this.  This is ICANN accountabilty.  And the Protocol and
Number communities have made it very clear that they are not intersteed
in what the Names community does with accountability, or much of
anything else the Names community cares about for that matter, as long
as we leave them out of it.

Also what do you think IANA is doing that related to human rights, as we
have had pounded into our heads, they are not making policy, they just
perform a clerical function doing what they are told to do by the OCs.

avri


On 07-Oct-15 05:02, ram.mohan wrote:
> Adding something like this has potent impact on IANA, not simply ICANN
> in a naming and policy function. Also see Sam Eisner's rationale.
>
> Any such suggestion should be run past the IETF and RIRs.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus