[Wp4] Discrete issue: Which bylaws formulation

[Nigel Roberts]

I do not support the idea of a call.

I think that, to be formal, we must create two alternatives, both of 
which are "minimal". One which refers to the UDHR and one which does not.

These two alternatives must be then placed before Members of the CCWG 
(i.e. not us participants) as the people chartered in this regard.


I personally support the UDHR verson, particularly after talking with 
Markus Kummer recently.

Mr reasons are as follows:

1.	It's the 'minimal' HR text that is support globally. While I like the 
business principles, I think it's a step to far at this stage.

2.	Leaving out a reference to any document exposes ICANN to the 
possibility that ANY human rights instrument or idea could be forced on 
is, such as the right to drinking water.




On 11/10/15 15:52, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> a. do we send just the agreed upon minimal bylaws text?
> b. or do we also send all the bracketed text?
>
> While I have been somewhat ambivalent on this issue, I think there is
> more support in both the WP and the larger group for minimal text in the
> bylaw.  I would support option a.
>
>
> avri
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>