[Wp4] Discrete issue: Which bylaws formulation

[Dr. Tatiana Tropina]

Thanks Greg
Well, when the deadline is approaching, so any edit can be a "final
edit" :) (/Feci quod potui faciant meliora potentes/, in a way)
I think the text already looked ok last time I checked it after the
changes proposed by Niels a couple of days ago, however, I think there
is a bit of confusion at the end about the bracketed language proposed
for consideration. There are two options with "bracketed language" in
the last part (I think we need to be crystal clear concerning what is
actually forwarded to the larger group - I assume, it's a short version)
+ I think there should be a bit of more details about the poll/results.
May be I am mistaken and can't remember exact wording, but I can't
access the document in a "normal way" from my mobile phone - can't add
the comments, etc. so in fact I can't correct anything.  I don't know
what kind of edits you are going to make - if the issues I mentioned
above won't be addressed, I can probably live with that...
Again, thanks a lot.
Best
Tanya

On 12/10/15 17:49, Greg Shatan wrote:
> I hesitate to call it a "final edit" but I can propose some edits this
> afternoon, after lunch (NY time), and others can see how that looks.
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina
> <t.tropina at mpicc.de <mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de>> wrote:
>
>     +1 to Greg
>
>     By the way, the deadline is today, right? I can't edit the
>     document because I am on holiday; have very limited time & access
>     to Internet. Is there anyone who is going to make final edits?
>
>     best,
>     Tatiana
>
>     On 12/10/15 16:57, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>     I think that there has been broad opposition to "cherry-picking"
>>     human rights.  I would apply this to the Ruggie principles as well.
>>
>>     Greg
>>
>>     On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na
>>     <mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
>>
>>         Nigel overlooked the reference to my profession, when we say
>>         "Look at"
>>         it usually involves scalpels :-)-O
>>
>>         So, how do the Ruggie principles look like without the subset?
>>
>>         el
>>
>>
>>         On 2015-10-12 13:37, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>         > Eberhard is misdirecting himself. We don't want to look at
>>         THAT subset.
>>         >
>>         > We should be looking at (in set theoretical terms) the relative
>>         > complement subset.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > N.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > On 12/10/15 12:27, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>         >> Paul,
>>         >>
>>         >> I was not going to die in a ditch about the Ruggie
>>         principles, but why
>>         >> don't we look at your subset?
>>         >>
>>         >> el
>>         >>
>>         >> On 2015-10-11 23:03, Paul Twomey wrote:
>>         >>> Nigel
>>         >>>
>>         >>> I am of a similar view as Tatiana's below.
>>         >>>
>>         >>> My stated concern has always been with some subset
>>         sections of the
>>         >>> Ruggie principles.  Not necessarily with UDHR.
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Paul
>>         >> [...]
>>         >>
>>
>>         --
>>         Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician &
>>         Gynaecologist (Saar)
>>         el at lisse.NA <mailto:el at lisse.NA>            / *     | 
>>          Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 <tel:%2B264%2081%20124%206733>
>>         (cell)
>>         PO Box 8421             \     /
>>         Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Wp4 mailing list
>>         Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Wp4 mailing list
>>     Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wp4 mailing list
>     Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151012/50798b3c/attachment-0001.html>