<pre class="k9mail">Pardon me. This time with attachment. <br /><br />Best,<br /><br />Niels<br /><br />On 18 December 2015 18:02:09 GMT+08:00, Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear all, <br /><br />By now you have probably all seen the comment of the board on the<br />proposed raft report, and especially annex 6. If not please find them<br />attached.<br /><br />I have to say I was both dismayed and struck by surprise when I read<br />the comments, but I am very curious to learn what you think.<br /><br />My main feeling was that we have already addressed all points that are<br />brought up, but again I am very curious to hear your opinion.<br /><br />Finally. The biggest surprise came from the suggestion of the use of<br />the public interest instrument, which seems to be quite far fetched to<br />use in case of human rights. !
I can
imagine the headline: ICANN board<br />think human rights are against the public interest.<br /><br />Looking forward to hear what you all think.<br /><br />All the best,<br /><br />Niels<br /><br /><br />.<br /></blockquote><br />-- <br />Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</pre>