[Ws2-diversity] diversity questionnaire - observations from 31jan mtg

[Pam Little]

I agree with Mathieu on this one. 

 

I think we are too late in the game for “open or value questions”. That’s why I suggested a more practical question earlier -  “whether they rotate meeting times” but somehow the question seems to have been deleted. 

 

Kind regards,

 

Pam

From: ws2-diversity-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-diversity-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 7:11 PM
To: Mathieu Weill
Cc: ws2-diversity at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-diversity] diversity questionnaire - observations from 31jan mtg

 

Dear Mathieu,

 

thanks for the comment, 

I think that in the questionnaire we tried to be too prescriptive and give some freedom for the SO/AC to respond as much possible (in the same fashion that we tried to reduce the number of questions). if they have legal constraints such requirements in their charter or bylaws, I would expect that they will state that in their response. 

 

The first question will give them the opportunity to indicate what elements of diversity we listed they take in consideration and maybe indicate the priority. The second question allows them to add any element we may have missed but important to them. 
The third question covers how the SO/AC track diversity and measure it, indicating which mechanisms they are applying if any.

 

I guess having diverse interpretations can help us in some way to understand how the different groups within ICANN perceive diversity and respond to it.

 

 

Best,

 

Rafik

 

2017-02-02 16:56 GMT+09:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>:

Dear Colleagues,

I think the questionnaire is taking good shape. Maybe my comment is
redundant, but I wonder whether the notions of "relevance" or "importance"
of diversity dimensions will be clear for our questionnaire's target
group.

Both notions can lead to very "diverse" interpretations, and I wonder
whether we should be more precise ? Are we asking them if they have legal
constraints, set targets for their groups, are tracking diversity levels ?


Best
Mathieu


-----Message d'origine-----
De : ws2-diversity-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ws2-diversity-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Renata Aquino
Ribeiro
Envoyé : jeudi 2 février 2017 02:57
À : ws2-diversity at icann.org
Objet : [Ws2-diversity] diversity questionnaire - observations from 31jan
mtg


Hi all

Pls. find the latest version of diversity questionnaire according to
observations from 31st jan meeting.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13UBH5JXmOvxA6H6Kg6W6o0GNDjfYRs3FwQULKS <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13UBH5JXmOvxA6H6Kg6W6o0GNDjfYRs3FwQULKScgSmw/edit> 
cgSmw/edit

Best,

Renata
_______________________________________________
Ws2-diversity mailing list
Ws2-diversity at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity
_______________________________________________
Ws2-diversity mailing list
Ws2-diversity at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-diversity/attachments/20170202/680ec558/attachment-0001.html>