[Ws2-hr] red line

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All, I have noted two textes ,
one proposed by Ann for which I suggested to replace " TOOL" by "
Mechanism" OR " Arrangement"
The other by Greg on which I have no comment
Regards
Kavouss

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Matthew Shears <matthew at intpolicy.com>
wrote:

> Happy to rejoin the drafting team to move this forward.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 08/08/2017 20:54, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Original text:
>>
>> When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also
>> consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human
>> Rights.  However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and
>> implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s
>> annual reporting.
>>
>> Text proposed by me on the call:
>>
>> When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider
>> using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as
>> HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
>> However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
>> appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
>> the organization's analysis should be reflected in
>> ICANN’s annual reporting.
>>
>> I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>>
> --
>
>
> Matthew Shears
> matthew at intpolicy.com
> +447712472987
> Skype:mshears
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170809/0443dfb1/attachment.html>