[Ws2-hr] WG: Draft Message to CCWG

Thu Aug 17 16:04:43 UTC 2017

Dear All
Having considered reply from Brésil, and as I clearly and
Repeatedly emphasised during the call any outcome from the so- called drafting  group needs approval of the three three Commenters.
Moreover' I support the virées from Brazil that  the drafting group should have invited Brésil, U.K. and Swiss to attend the meeting .
Thus we need to revert back to the subject with advance notice to these commenters to attend the call irrespective of their attendance status
The outcome thus is does accepted by Me
Kavouss
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 16:45, <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
> 
> Fyi see below - just in case this message from our Brazilian colleague had not reached the list.
> Kind regards
> Jorge 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira [mailto:thiago.jardim at itamaraty.gov.br] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. August 2017 14:46
> An: 'lists at nielstenoever.net' <lists at nielstenoever.net>; 'ws2-hr at icann.org' <ws2-hr at icann.org>
> Cc: Cancio Jorge BAKOM <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>; Mark Carvell (mark.carvell at culture.gov.uk) <mark.carvell at culture.gov.uk>; Benedicto Fonseca Filho <benedicto.fonseca at itamaraty.gov.br>
> Betreff: RE: [Ws2-hr] Draft Message to CCWG
> 
> Dear Niels,
> 
> It has been drawn to our attention that the comments and suggestions made by Brazil on the Framework of Interpretation of Human Rights were not accepted. Brazil examined the "answers" the subgroup provided and feels they do not adequately addresses our concerns, nor do they adequately answer the points we raised. We regret that we have not been invited to take part in the discussions leading to this outcome and would like that a disclaimer be included in whatever document is circulated with these "answers", stating that (i) Brazil was not invited to participate in the discussions where the subgroup considered Brazil's comments and that (ii) Brazil does not endorse or support the "answers" provided by the subgroup. Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Thiago Jardim
> 
> 
> Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira
> Secretary, Information Society Division
> Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Brazil
> +55 61 2030 6389
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Niels ten Oever
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. August 2017 14:53
> An: ws2-hr at icann.org
> Betreff: [Ws2-hr] Draft Message to CCWG
> 
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> 
> 
> I hope this e-mail finds you all very well. As a follow up to yesterdays meeting Bernie and I have prepared a response to the CCWG that you can find underneath, as well as a more detailed overview attached.
> 
> 
> 
> This is a first draft. We would very much like to hear you comments, suggestions and improvements.
> 
> 
> 
> All the best,
> 
> 
> 
> Niels
> 
> 
> 
> The Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN’s Accountability Human Rights Subgroup would like to sincerely thanks those who have taken the time and effort to submit public comment to the Framework of Interpretation and Considerations document during the Public Comment Period [0].
> 
> 
> 
> The Subgroup has analyzed and discussed the comments at great length and came to the following conclusions:
> 
> 
> 
> The mandate of the group does not include suggesting any changes to the ICANN Bylaws, this includes the Bylaw on Human Rights. As such any comments which would require changing the Bylaws cannot be accepted.
> 
> This is the case for comments recommending changes in the hierarchy of Core Values as outlined in the bylaw or for comments pertaining the use of the term “applicable law” which is part of ICANN’s Human Rights bylaw.
> 
> 
> 
> The Subgroup does recognize that the documents mentioned in the footnotes are not necessarily an exhaustive list of human rights document, and therefore the text has been  changed from ‘including:’ to ‘including, but not limited to:’.
> 
> 
> 
> Finally, no new references to any instrument in general or the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights in specific have been added. The group feels the current proposed wording is a balanced consensus between the different opinions held in the ICANN community, particularly concerning the remit of ICANN’s Mission.
> 
> 
> 
> The HR sub-group has developed a document which lists a response to each of the major comments submitted to the public consultation and is including it in this email for reference by the CCWG-Accountability-WS2.
> 
> This will be published on the public consultation web site as part of the standard process.
> 
> 
> 
> As such the HR sub-group is submitting its final recommendations for an HR FoI to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 for approval. Given the submissions made in the public comment process and the minimal changes that have been made to the document to address these the HR sub-group would not recommend this version be posted for public comment.
> 
> 
> 
> [0] https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/foi-hr-2017-05-05-en> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Niels ten Oever
> 
> Head of Digital
> 
> 
> 
> Article 19
> 
> www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org> 
> 
> 
> 
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
> 
>                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr