[Ws2-hr] Outcomes of todays call

[Arasteh]

Niels 
Thanks
Apart from you , how many participants ( not observer and not secretariat ) were attending the call?
Did you gave Quran?
Minimum 6 participants should have been present?.
I do not understand your majority and minority definition
Four participants unable to attend were objecting to the text.
How many agreed with your text
Pls kindly correct yr statement.
Regards
Kavouss


Sent from my iPhone

> On 22 Aug 2017, at 22:00, Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net> wrote:
> 
> Human Rights sub-group participants,
> 
> On today’s Human Rights call we completed the first reading of our
> report back to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 plenary with unanimous
> consent (documents attached).
> 
> The sub-group does recognize that some participants who disagree with
> portions of the report were unable to attend the call and therefore as
> per the CCWG WS2 Charter Section V this would only constitute a
> consensus decision.
> 
> It was also agreed that those participants wishing to include a minority
> opinion statement in the final report should be allowed to do so.
> 
> As such any such minority opinion statements by participants should be
> available to the sub-group by Monday 28 August 23:59 UTC so they can be
> considered as part of the second reading on Tuesday 29 August 19:00 UTC.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Niels
> 
> -- 
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
> 
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
> 
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> <Revisions to HR Subgroup email to CCWG Plenary.docx>
> <CCWG-Accountability-WS2-HumanRights-PublicConsultation-Overview.xlsx>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr