[Ws2-hr] HR subgroup question to CCWG plenary

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello again,

Looking at the attached document (which I expect is the mandate referred to
by Niel), it seem to me that Annex 12 clearly enumerate that those listed
bullet points needs to be considered as the FoI is being developed.

I did not follow the work of the HR holistically but if we say we now have
an FoI, it is assumed that the group considered and fulfilled the bullet
point items, otherwise there isn't an FoI yet as it is expected that those
considerations would inform the FoI drafting.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 8 Jan 2017 17:57, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Niel,
>
> Thanks for your mail, just a question inline on one of your point.
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 7 Jan 2017 18:31, "Niels ten Oever" <lists at nielstenoever.net> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please refer to this version of the email instead.  The prior version
> inadvertently quoted from a draft version of the WS1 report.
>
> .......
>
>  In these discussions,  it felt as though  we were going into too much
> detail, and stepping outside of the mandate of our Subgroup.
>
>
> SO: Could you share reference to the mandate of the subgroup?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> 5. A fifth  option could be (and this might be a mix between option 1
> and 3) to issue high-level recommendations on how ICANN and the SO’s and
> AC’s could best operationalize the core value contained in  the Human
> Rights Bylaw.  These recommendations could include (a) chartering a GNSO
> Working Group on Human Rights to consider and recommend how the Bylaw
> should be taken into account in gTLD policy development and
> implementation, and/or (b) chartering Working Groups in each of the
> other SO’s and AC’s for purposes relevant to their remit, and/or (c)
> chartering a new CCWG on Human Rights to specifically consider the steps
> needed to make the Bylaw operational, and provide guidance to each of
> the SO's and AC's on how they could incorporate  the CCWG’s output in
> their processes, as well as discussing measures that could be adopted by
> ICANN, the corporation, with respect to its own internal human
> resources, employment, and contracting practices  based on the Bylaw.
>
> We would like to bring these five options in front of the plenary, and
> we would greatly appreciate your thoughts on these and potentially other
> options.
>
> The Human Rights Subgroup wishes you a revitalizing festive season and
> we're greatly looking forward to completing our work in Workstream 2
> with you all in 2017.
>
> All the best,
>
> The CCWG Accountability Human Rights Subgroup
>
> PS Thanks Greg and Brett for finding this error and for helping to
> correct it.
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170108/e42f369a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: HRIssuePaper.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 145495 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170108/e42f369a/HRIssuePaper-0001.pdf>