<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">On Sep 4, 2016, at 2:12 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <<a href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn" class="">tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn</a>> wrote:<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><span style="color: rgb(0, 46, 122); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;" class="">I agree with Paul that among the main questions for us to come up with a
Frame of Interpretation of the Human Rights in the ICANN mission would be:</span><br class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 120%;" class=""><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><ul class="MailOutline"><li class=""><span style="color: rgb(0, 46, 122); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 120%; text-indent: -18pt;" class=""> What substance we see in the phrase human rights inside ICANN Mission?</span></li><li class=""><span style="color: rgb(0, 46, 122); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 120%; text-indent: -18pt;" class=""> </span><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt; color: rgb(0, 46, 122); font-size: 11pt; line-height: 120%; font-family: Calibri;" class=""><span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';" class=""> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt; color: rgb(0, 46, 122); font-size: 11pt; line-height: 120%; font-family: Calibri;" class="">When, if ever, ICANN should give that substance (whatever it may be)
effect?</span></li></ul></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>It might be useful to consider this question with regard to the specific roles </div><div>undertaken in the name “ICANN”… For example, I could understand having</div><div>the “ICANN community” provide due consideration in the policy development</div><div>process to any potential issue raised with regard to human rights implications </div><div>of a proposed policy; it’s less clear whether one wants “ICANN Global Domains </div><div>Division” or ICANN’s PTI” weighing human rights issues during the policy </div><div>implementation process. It is fairly important to be clear about the desired </div><div>outcome of any framework, since application would have very different </div><div>implications when done with different portions of ICANN’s eclectic structure.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>/John</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Disclaimer: my views alone. </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>