<div dir="auto">Find below - In response to Greg's suggestion. Even though I do think it might be more relevant within the plenary.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers!<br><br><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">Sent from my LG G4<br>Kindly excuse brevity and typos</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 27, 2017 19:15, "Seun Ojedeji" <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">Thanks, do find inline:</div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 26, 2017 2:11 PM, "León Felipe Sánchez Ambía" <<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="m_-2782165809724912904quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Dear all,<div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Considering these and other factors the Co-Chairs would recommend that the Human Rights sub-group confirm that it has completed developing the Human Rights FOI per Annex 12 of the CCWG-Accountability WS1 Recommendations.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">SO: Exact question that I have been asking as well, which also implies that it's not helpful to put the draft FoI to public comment without getting clear response on the point above!</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="m_-2782165809724912904quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Should the sub-group feel that it should develop suggestions for ICANN implementing the HR FOI based on its work to date the Co-Chairs would be amenable to this and would invite the HR sub-group to submit any such suggestions to the plenary for consideration by early May 2017, if there was no objection from the plenary.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">SO: May I ask the Co-Chairs to clarify what part of the WS1 report mandates the HR subgroup to carry out the task above or is this WS2 assigning a new task to the subgroup?. Like I have said, it seem to me that all HR needed to produce was the FoI and they just need to confirm if the draft they sent was done is consideration of Annex 12 period!</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="m_-2782165809724912904quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div>
<div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thomas, Mathieu and León</div>
</div>
<br></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community<wbr>@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/accountability-cross-c<wbr>ommunity</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>