[Ws2-jurisdiction] Agenda for Jurisdiction Subgroup Meeting #12

[Greg Shatan]

Kavouss,

Based on our work plan, we will get to remedies after we identify and agree
upon issues.  If there are issues for which immunity should be considered
as a possible remedy, we will discuss this concept at that time.  The same
is true of the concept of "additional jurisdiction."  I have not seen the
third issue raised in this group, nor is it mentioned in Annex 12, so I
can't say that this issue is in scope for this subgroup.

"Question 3" is on the agenda as item #3.  Please be more cautious in
raising complaints of "suppression," as there was no suppression.  The
additional question is on the mailing list, just in a different email
thread, as it has been all along.

Now that you've brought up the issue of support for this question, I need
to say that your count is incorrect.  There has been a good deal more
opposition than support for sending out this third question.  Nonetheless,
we've given this question the best chance to gain further support by
continuing to discuss how it could be revised, which is only fair.  But
it's also fair to understand that support for this question has been
limited so far, compare to those who have voiced objections to it.

Greg



On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Grec,
>
> When you address the following ISSUES:
>
> 1.Immunity taking into account who / what is immune vis a vis whom / what?
>
> 2. Provision of additional jurisdiction such as what, Swiss jurisdiction
> or what?
>
> 3. Sovereignty of States via a vis Californian Law or law of any State?
>
> Please kindly put back the question 3 which was on the mailing list till
> yesterday evening Central European time but it was suppressed as results of
> only two objections while many others were in favour of it with some
> language aligbnment
>
> Regards
>
> 2016-12-05 6:09 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> Here is the agenda for Meeting #12 at 19:00 UTC on December 5.  Please
>> continue to discuss the "experience solicitation" questions and the
>> proposed additional question between now and then.  Attention to the Google
>> doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_uxN8A5J3iaofnGlr5gYo
>> FVKudgg_DuwDgIuyICPzbk/edit?usp=sharing is also important to keep our
>> work moving forward.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161205/1199a073/attachment-0001.html>