[Ws2-jurisdiction] Pool.com case summary

[Paul Rosenzweig]

+1  The same thing would apply no matter where ICANN is incorporated.
Indeed, this is not a statement of exclusion -- ICANN  has the same
obligations wherever it does business.

P

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
www.redbranchconsulting.com
My PGP Key:
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Roberts
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:25 PM
To: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Pool.com case summary

Similar provisions would apply in European countries, including checks on
terrorist and criminal financing, and moneylaundering.

ICANN has to follow the law of wherever it is located. I find this
preferable to ICANN being immune to the consequences of its own misfeasance
and/or negligence




On 07/04/17 16:07, parminder wrote:
>
> What do you make of the following passage from
_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction