[Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL

[Paul Rosenzweig]

Dear Subgroup members

 

I want to respectfully note my full support for Greg’s process here.  We act as a subgroup.  No individual member has any right that I am aware of to demand action from ICANN, from the CCWG or from the Subgroup.     

 

In particular, I want to publicly defend Greg against any claim that he is “not acting properly” or that his behavior is either “unprecedented” or “unacceptable” or “unfair.”  I also disagree that Greg is “wasting . . . time” or that he needs to “behave” or that there are “motivations” (presumably nefarious) “behind his actions.”  Quite to the contrary Greg has been a model of decorum and neutrality in a difficult position and any suggestion otherwise is without factual foundation.

 

Regards to all

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com

My PGP Key:  <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

 

From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Arasteh
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 5:36 PM
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Cc: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL

 

Greg

What do you mean by sub group decides 

You  are blocking all my roquets

I raised questions they were answered incomplete or not answered at all

This  us my  right to ask written answer and gas nothing to do with the approval if the group    

I am tired of thus sort of 

blacking.

You are not acting properly and I formally register complaint for such unfair tressent.

Your behaviour is not acceptable and categorically rejected

I do not agree that you treat a member of the group so aggressively

You have interrupted me with an unprecedented behaviour

Pls explain.

You act negatively to all my proposal

You di not want to find a solution for these problems

You just wasting our time 

We disagree with your working method.

Either behave or .....

Reply. Explain

There are motivation behind your

 unfair actions

Kavouss

 

 

 

 

    

  



Sent from my iPhone


On 1 Aug 2017, at 21:55, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com> > wrote:

Kavouss, 

 

Kindly direct your request to the Subgroup, and not to Sam.  This is a matter for the Subgroup to consider, rather than any individual participant.  The Subgroup can take up your request and decide whether to ask for written responses to questions (and if so, which questions).  Thank you.

 

Best regards,

 

Greg

 

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> > wrote:

Dear Sam, With tks to your presentation, pls kindly note that I nned written answers to the questions raised before the meeting and those during the meeing either as intervention or in the chat.

Regards

Kavouss 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170801/743d806f/attachment-0001.html>