[Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL

[Phil Corwin]

Greg's leadership of this subgroup has been fair and evenhanded, especially given the sensitivity of the subject matter and diversity of members' views.


If members feel that certain questions deserve written responses that go beyond or expand upon yesterday's exchange with Sam I have no objection to that.



Philip S. Corwin

Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/Cell


Twitter: @VLawDC


"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey




________________________________
From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of McAuley, David via Ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 11:31 AM
To: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL


Thank you, Leon,



This subgroup is handling perhaps the most sensitive issue in Work Stream Two – and we are now at the difficult time near the end of deliberations if we are to get our report out on schedule.



Greg has, as rapporteur, what is basically a near-impossible job and he has handled it willingly and essentially by himself – and, in my personal opinion, fairly.



I thought Sam’s presentation yesterday was very informative and it is all on record – her presentation as well as her extemporaneous answers to questions.   Again, in my personal opinion, this is sufficient record.



I disagree with the criticisms and voice my support for Greg’s leadership. I hope and trust that we can all remain constructively engaged as we do the heavy-lifting to bring this important work to conclusion.



Best regards,

David



David McAuley

Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager

Verisign Inc.

703-948-4154



From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 6:13 PM
To: Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
Cc: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL



Dear all,



Let me, once again, call everyone to remain respectful and collegiate as our group has characterized to be since the beginning.



We are all volunteers and we all deserve respect to the work we do and to our points of view.



I understand there might be frustration when our views do not gain traction at a subgroup level but we need to keep our energy focused on building solutions and in line with our working methods. That is, if a subgroup considers that a given request is relevant to the work the subgroup is carrying then the subgroup may request follow up or action on the item. If the subgroup considers a given topic or request does not seem to add to the subgroups work at that particular point in time, then the subgroup members are encouraged to focus their energy in continue to build consensus on the topics being discussed.



That doesn’t rule out, of course, any views or requests but it does subject said views or requests to the decision making process of each subgroup or the plenary as the case may be.



My respect and recognition to all members and participants of the different subgroups. Let us continue in good spirit the work that we have been trusted with.



Kind regards,







León



El 01/08/2017, a las 16:35, Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> escribió:



Greg

What do you mean by sub group decides

You  are blocking all my roquets

I raised questions they were answered incomplete or not answered at all

This  us my  right to ask written answer and gas nothing to do with the approval if the group

I am tired of thus sort of

blacking.

You are not acting properly and I formally register complaint for such unfair tressent.

Your behaviour is not acceptable and categorically rejected

I do not agree that you treat a member of the group so aggressively

You have interrupted me with an unprecedented behaviour

Pls explain.

You act negatively to all my proposal

You di not want to find a solution for these problems

You just wasting our time

We disagree with your working method.

Either behave or .....

Reply. Explain

There are motivation behind your

 unfair actions

Kavouss














Sent from my iPhone

On 1 Aug 2017, at 21:55, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:

Kavouss,



Kindly direct your request to the Subgroup, and not to Sam.  This is a matter for the Subgroup to consider, rather than any individual participant.  The Subgroup can take up your request and decide whether to ask for written responses to questions (and if so, which questions).  Thank you.



Best regards,



Greg



On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear Sam, With tks to your presentation, pls kindly note that I nned written answers to the questions raised before the meeting and those during the meeing either as intervention or in the chat.

Regards

Kavouss




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170802/4ea08bf3/attachment-0001.html>