[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: RES: RES: ISSUE - unilateral jurisdiction of one country over ICANN

[Paul Rosenzweig]

Sorry, but that just doesn’t make any sense legally.  It is a good statement of purpose from your perspective, but it isn’t an operational statement.  I was heartened to see you try and identify some other provisions of American law that you think ICANN should be immune from (most of which, by the way, do not involve the vagaries of US foreign policy and so contradict your purpose statement – but that is another issue).  Let’s focus on that.

 

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com

My PGP Key:  <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

 

From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of parminder
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 7:09 AM
To: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: RES: RES: ISSUE - unilateral jurisdiction of one country over ICANN

 

 

On Monday 21 August 2017 04:29 PM, Nigel Roberts wrote:

And what will ICANN then be immune from? 


Milton put it nicely, to quote, "... from the vagaries of U.S. foreign policy or other laws and policies that would circumvent ICANN’s accountability to its global MS community." 





_______________________________________________ 
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list 
Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>  
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170821/00d3e896/attachment.html>