[Ws2-jurisdiction] Issue: US's courts' judicial writ over all aspects of ICANN

[Paul Rosenzweig]

And, of course, as well, as an entity operating in the UK, India, Brazil,
Iran, Australia and ... every other country in the world, ICANN is also
subject to the full range of those laws to the extent those countries chose
to apply them.  Since that choice is =completely= independent of the place
of incorporation this issue is a non-issue for which no solution is
possible, much less required.

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
www.redbranchconsulting.com
My PGP Key:
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Roberts
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 3:43 AM
To: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Issue: US's courts' judicial writ over all
aspects of ICANN



On 28/08/17 03:31, parminder wrote:
> Issue
>
> As a US based entity, ICANN is subject to full range of US laws.

And how is this different from ANY jurisdiction ICANN might be incorporated
in?

Unless you want to give ICANN UN-style diplomatic immunity, which I would
most vigorously continue to oppose.

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction