[Ws2-jurisdiction] Additional Document for upcoming meeting

[Nigel Roberts]

First reaction

This is well-written and an excellent start.

I did find the footnotes highly confusing - particularly the presence of 
half of footnote 6 on the next page, and I was thoroughly confused by 
footnote 7. But these are minor issues.


A suggestion: I think it would be helpful to share this with the ccNSO 
Council, for early comment and feedback from Council and the wider ccTLD 
community, either now, or following further revision.

The text is understandably specific about gTLD aspects, but relatively 
silent about ccTLD aspects - and the work of PTI has been directly 
affected by recent re-interpretations of OFAC by ICANN.

I personally think a similar exposition of how the IANA deals with 
ccTLDs to match the RAA specifics would be required for full coverage of 
the issues.

I'd be interested in the view of the Chair of the subgroup on the 
appropriate liaison procedure here.



Nigel Roberts
(ccNSO Council Member, EU region)


On 30/08/17 08:37, Greg Shatan wrote:
> All,
>
> As mentioned on the Plenary Call, the attached first draft
> recommendation regarding OFAC, assembled from the input of various
> participants, will be reviewed on the Subgroup call.
>
> The Agenda will be amended accordingly.
>
> I look forward to comments from the Subgroup.irst
>
> GregF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>