[Ws2-jurisdiction] Case summary - 2 drafts for your review

[Mathieu Weill]

Dear Colleagues,



During a long flight today, I tried to apply our case summary form to two
of the past ICANN litigations. Both forms are attached for :

-          The State of Arizona vs NTIA case in Sep 2016 (I guess many of
us are familiar with this case)

-          The 2004-2006 Verisign vs ICANN case



I’d appreciate feedbacks from the group regarding whether the detail level
is appropriate, and whether the information is relevant to the various
questions. Thank you for your understanding if there are any confusions
due to my lack of legal skills.



Best,



--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
 <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170126/18aee114/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Form Jurisdiction case Verisign vs ICANN.DOCX
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 22812 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170126/18aee114/FormJurisdictioncaseVerisignvsICANN-0001.DOCX>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Form Jurisdiction case Arizona State vs NTIA .docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 23947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170126/18aee114/FormJurisdictioncaseArizonaStatevsNTIA-0001.docx>