[Ws2-jurisdiction] [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed Addition to Jurisdiction Subgroup Report

[Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX]

Dear Greg, all

Thanks for that. It is fine by me.

Best,

2017-11-02 4:36 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:

> All,
>
> Based on the discussions in the Plenary at ICANN 60, the following task
> was decided:
>
>    - Jurisdiction second reading of draft recommendations – Approved with
>    4 objections but certain edits are required. These include the proposed
>    text from Jorge Cancio with respect to continuing the jurisdiction
>    discussions
>    ​....
>
>
> ​Having reviewed the transcript, including Jorge's intervention, related
> interventions by others, and Thomas's recapitulation​ of this point, I have
> drafted the proposed language below (and also attached) to be added to the
> Subgroup Report, most likely at the end of the Subgroup Report.
>
>
> ​I hope that this has captured the spirit of the discussion reasonably
> well.​
>
> Greg
>
>
> *FURTHER DISCUSSIONS OF JURISDICTION-RELATED CONCERNS*
>
> There were a number of concerns raised in the Subgroup where the Subgroup
> had substantive discussions, but did not get to a point of conclusion.  As
> an example, there were discussions of limited or partial immunity for ICANN
> that did not come to conclusion.
>
> These concerns were put on the table by different stakeholders, and for
> these stakeholders, these are legitimate concerns.  As these concerns were
> not discussed to the end, there should be a path forward for these concerns
> beyond the CCWG-Accountability, which was tasked to look into a limited
> number of issues within a limited period of time and with a limited budget.
>
> Therefore, the Subgroup suggests that a further other multistakeholder
> process of some kind should be considered to allow for further
> consideration, and potentially resolution, of these concerns.  We believe
> that this Report, with its annexes, can be a very useful tool for further
> debates which will surely take place – whether in another
> cross-constituency effort or in a future ATRT Review, or in some other
> ICANN context.  The appropriate forum for such discussions is beyond the
> mandate of the CCWG; however, we encourage the community to build on the
> work of the Subgroup and prior work in this area.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


-- 
Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rapha%C3%ABl-beauregard-lacroix-88733786/> -
@rbl0012 <https://twitter.com/rbl0112> - M: +33 7 86 39 18 15
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20171104/3ce33a50/attachment.html>