<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texte de bulles Car";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.TextedebullesCar
{mso-style-name:"Texte de bulles Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texte de bulles";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=FR link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Your memory is excellent Jorge, <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I have checked my records and found this working documents. Some parts of the document were later integrated into the 2<sup>nd</sup> report late July. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thanks for digging this out ! Certainly the closest we got to a “gap analysis”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Best<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Mathieu<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>De :</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch [mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch] <br><b>Envoyé :</b> mardi 20 septembre 2016 09:55<br><b>À :</b> gregshatanipc@gmail.com; ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org<br><b>Cc :</b> mathieu.weill@afnic.fr<br><b>Objet :</b> AW: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG Plenary Topic: Gap Analysis<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Dear Greg<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>If I’m not mistaken some discussion on the „gap analysis“ took place in the CCWG under the leadership of Mathieu in July 2015 – perhaps he may point us to relevant documents where this was further elaborated…<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Jorge <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=DE style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Von:</span></b><span lang=DE style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Greg Shatan<br><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 20. September 2016 06:57<br><b>An:</b> ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org<br><b>Betreff:</b> [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG Plenary Topic: Gap Analysis<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>All,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>As mentioned in my prior email, we discussed seeking clarification from the CCWG Plenary regarding the Annex 12 statement that the Jurisdiction work should include "confirming and assessing the gap analysis." The statement does not include any further identification of the gap analysis or its results.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>To the best of our knowledge, there is no analysis done in WS1 that was called a "gap analysis" in so many words. Our rough interpretation is that this refers to the (implicit?) determination that there were no significant gaps in the accountability proposals resulting from ICANN's current jurisdictional framework. However, clarifying (or correcting) this would be helpful. To bring this back to the CWG Plenary, I would propose the following question:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>The scope of the Jurisdiction topic in Annex 12 includes "confirming and assessing the gap analysis." </span></b><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>1. Can the CCWG Plenary identify the "gap analysis" referred to? </span></b><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>2. If there was no formal gap analysis, is it correct to assume that this refers to a determination that there were no significant gaps in the WS1 accountability proposal resulting from ICANN's current jurisdictional framework? </span></b><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE-CH style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Greg<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></body></html>