<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Greg</div><div>Dear Erika$</div><div> What is the problem that you indicate that in the introductory part of the Report.</div><div>You have asked me on 13 and 18 of September to provide you with the factual evidence on this type of discrimination or restriction and I have provided that to you.</div><div>You you are blocking it. You are are expected to reflect the report on this type of restriction whether directly or indirectly related to OFAC.</div><div>Your action is not to decide what is right and what is wrong. There is no veto right given to you .I insist to reflect that .</div><div>Pls kindly do not further block this</div><div>You blocking whatever, you do not like </div><div>Pls kindly, ionce again. be helpful, fair and collaborative </div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Greg Shatan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Kavouss,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">As a factual happening, I don't see why this should be reflected in our report. Resello's business decision does not seem to be related to OFAC, US jurisdiction or to any ICANN-related jurisdiction.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I asked you whether Resello's agreement with ICANN (the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA)) prohibits Resello from establishing the policy you have mentioned. If ICANN does not prohibit this policy, and it is not triggered by OFAC or some other connection to ICANN's jurisdictions, then it seems to be unconnected to our work.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I don't know whether there is an EU or Dutch law that requires this policy, or whether there is one that prohibits it. If there is one that requires it, that is not an "ICANN jurisdiction" issue. If there is one that prohibits it and Resello is violating Dutch law, then it may be that Resello is violating the RAA requirement (Section 3.7.2) that Registrars abide by applicable law. But again, that's a Compliance issue.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Best regards,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Greg</div><div>I do not know what question you raised. </div><div>If you believe that <font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><strong><em>Mark Assenberg<br></em> from Resello which is a subsidiary company for </strong><strong>Yourholding<span></span></strong><strong> holding:</strong></font></font></font></div><p style="margin:0in 0in 8pt"><b>with the below address <a href="https://maps.google.com/?q=Ceintuurbaan+28+8024+AA+Zwolle&entry=gmail&source=g" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight:normal"><font color="#0563c1" face="Calibri" size="3">Ceintuurbaan 28</font></span></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">,<a href="https://maps.google.com/?q=Ceintuurbaan+28+8024+AA+Zwolle&entry=gmail&source=g" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight:normal"><font color="#0563c1" face="Calibri" size="3">8024 AA Zwolle</font></span></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">, <a href="tel:+31%2038%20453%200752" target="_blank" value="+31384530752">+31 38 453 0752</a></font></font></b></p><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><div style="margin:0in 0in 8pt"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"><strong>based in Netherlands.being a non US-Based company on the basis of which </strong>section of the RAA refrain such a business decision (i.e., a registrar deciding not to do business with citizens of a given country (whether it is Canada, Haiti, Iran or otherwise)?</font></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 8pt"><font face="Calibri">May you address this issue as a factual happening .</font></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 8pt"><font face="Calibri">Pls kindly advise how you trest and reflect that in the report</font></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 8pt"><font face="Calibri">Regards</font></div><span class="m_179421586796006409HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div style="margin:0in 0in 8pt"><font face="Calibri">Kavouss </font></div></font></span></font></font></div><div class="m_179421586796006409HOEnZb"><div class="m_179421586796006409h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Nigel Roberts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net" target="_blank">nigel@channelisles.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><span><br>
<br>
On 20/09/17 18:19, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
Can you please guide me to the section of the RAA that would prevent<br>
such a business decision (i.e., a registrar deciding not to do business<br>
with citizens of a given country (whether it is Canada, Haiti, Iran or<br>
otherwise)?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
In the United Kingdom, never mind the RAA<a href="https://maps.google.com/?q=Ceintuurbaan+28,8024+AA+Zwolle+%3Chttps://maps.google.com/?q%3DCeintuurbaan%2B28%2B8024%2BAA%2BZwolle%26entry%3Dgmail%26source%3Dg%3E&entry=gmail&source=g">,</a> this would be quite illegal (see s.13, prohibited conduct) unless such treatment is required by law (e.g. required by legally binding sanctions).<br>
<br>
How can anyone in the 21st century believe that any "business decision" doctrine could allow making decisions on the basis of race/citizenship (or any other protected characteristic) is quite alien over here and incomprehensible.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://www.legislation.gov.uk/<wbr>ukpga/2010/15</a><div class="m_179421586796006409m_-6991801866680924351HOEnZb"><div class="m_179421586796006409m_-6991801866680924351h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>