<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Greg,</div><div>TOP URGENT</div><div>I disagree with your course of action removing the pargraph that was included in the final draft.</div><div>We have not made such decision for removal</div><div>One participant who was not attending the 16 Sept later on did not like the language but he did not proposed its removal</div><div>Moreover, based on comments reveived after the meeting you were not authorized to unilaterlly remove a paragraph which was included -</div><div>If the language in that pargraph to be softened , I am reay to discuss that but not unilateral removal of the full paragraph.</div><div>Your authority is limited to conduc the meeting but bnot to decide for evry b ody.</div><div>Pls immediate re insert that pargraph and either redicuss it or send it to CCWG Plenary </div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Greg</div><div>Tks for the doc.</div><div>Surprisingly I saw that that you have unilaterally removed the last paragraph that I have added and commented by Paul Rosenweig</div><div>As I mentioned we can soften the langauge such as replacement of "MUST" by "should" as well as few other area to soften the language but I do not agree that you reomove that entire paragraph since somebody did not like that.</div><div>This is a multistakeholder approach and view of everybody must be taken into account.</div><div>Consequently there is no consensus in the draft you have declared as finalized pls reconsider the matter.</div><div>Regards</div><div>kvouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Greg Shatan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">All,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I have attached a further revised OFAC Recommendation, reflecting changes suggested by Kavouss Arasteh and Seun Ojedeji. Word and PDF versions are attached, and the Google Doc reflects these suggested changes as well.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I look forward to our call.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Best regards,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div>
<br></div></div><span>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br>
<br></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>