<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Co-Chairs</div><div>Mr. Milton Muller should formally appologize for his inappropriate statement as Highlighted in Red.</div><div>Regarding other parts of his statement I have no comments as everyone is free to express his or her views</div><div>This formal appology is required before this eveing meeting </div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Dear Co-Chair </span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">I request you to study the statement and allegation made against me by Mr. Muller as indicated in colour</span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Tks</span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">See Below </span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">Greg and all members of the subgroup.<u><u></u></u></span></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u><u><u><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">I support the draft with your edits in red, which are intended to accommodate the concerns of Arasteh Kavouss.<u><u></u></u></span></u></u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u><u><u><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">I oppose ALL the proposed additional text suggested by Kavouss (in light blue). That text adds nothing substantive to the recommendations and #2 in particular recounts a specific incident in needless detail that is not relevant to the section it is placed in. <u><u></u></u></span></u></u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u><u><u><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u> <u></u></u></span></u></u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u><u><u><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt">I would remind us of the definition of rough consensus; it is clear that Kavouss’s changes have been proposed numerous times, we understand his reasoning, and yet they command _<i>no support</i>_ from anyone else. Therefore they can be left out of the report and we should proceed. <u><u></u></u></span></u></u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u><u><u><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><u> <u></u></u></span></u></u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u><u><u><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><font color="#ff0000">I would remind Mr. Kavouss that his repetitive and dilatory insistence on these changes is actually undermining our attempt to make progress on OFAC sanctions and are against the interests of people in his own country. <span></span></font><span><span><u><u></u></u></span></span></span></u></u></u></p></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>