<div dir="auto"><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">Sent from my mobile<br>Kindly excuse brevity and typos</div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 2, 2017 2:22 PM, "Wilkinson" <<a href="mailto:mail@christopherwilkinson.eu">mail@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div>Also, if it is still the case that ICANN has not yet applied to ‘secure an OFAC license for all such applicants…’, that is a great shame.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>ICANN should not need the whole apparatus of the CCWG before undertaking that which is glaringly obviously required for it to execute its global mandate.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">SO: +1 to this. However if a community mandate further help ICANN org support their OFAC immunity request then that's fine.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards</div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div><br></div><div>CW</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div class="elided-text"><div>On 2 Oct 2017, at 08:01, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="m_2123700559862032019Apple-interchange-newline"></div><div><div class="elided-text"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">All,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">In order to finalize the OFAC Recommendation, I attach a copy of the latest draft of the OFAC Recommendation with several proposed changes. I need to ascertain the level of support for including these changes.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">On our last call, we discussed these proposed changes, and also suggestions made on the list to include an instance involving the registrar Resello. Based on that call and discussion on the list, I believe that the group supports finalizing the document without the suggested changes. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">As discussed on the call, I am distributing this version of the OFAC Recommendation with the following statement:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><i>During the preparation of this Recommendation, the Subgroup considered an email where a registrar declined to do business with a potential reseller, based on the registrar’s policy of not doing business with people with Iranian passports. The Subgroup also learned that this registrar, which had been registering domains for a number of Iranian nationals, refused to continue to do business with them. The Subgroup has concluded that, to the extent these instances are related to OFAC, the concerns raised by these instances are adequately covered in the Recommendation already without any additional changes. This is not in any way a comment on the validity of these particular concerns. </i></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">If you have not already done so, please respond and indicate whether or not you support the inclusion of these suggested changes or the Resello matter in the OFAC Recommendation.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Thank you.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div></div>
</div><span id="m_2123700559862032019cid:8395CC2D-DE13-4502-AACC-08B64BA89197"><OFAC Recommendation with Proposed Changes.docx></span><span id="m_2123700559862032019cid:FC1866AC-BC2C-423D-8051-74725A261020"><OFAC Recommendation with Proposed Changes.pdf></span>__________________<wbr>_____________________________<div class="quoted-text"><br>Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>