<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I agree with Farzaneh about support for these options. Support for option 4 (could live with option 1 if consensus is emerging around that one however).<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class="">Robin<br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Mar 2, 2018, at 10:52 AM, farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" class="">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I support no change (option 4). If there is deadlock then I can live with option 1. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Best</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br class=""></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all" class=""><div class=""><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><font face="verdana, sans-serif" class="">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div></div>
<br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:31 PM, McAuley, David via Ws2-jurisdiction <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" class="">
<div class="m_-2230359216995242267WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">Thanks Greg,<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">I also support #4, no change.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">David<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">David McAuley<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Verisign Inc.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="tel:(703)%20948-4154" value="+17039484154" target="_blank" class="">703-948-4154</a><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p>
</div><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p>
<div class="">
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in" class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><b class="">From:</b> Ws2-jurisdiction [mailto:<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">ws2-jurisdiction-<wbr class="">bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b class="">On Behalf Of </b>Steve DelBianco<br class="">
<b class="">Sent:</b> Friday, March 02, 2018 1:08 PM<br class="">
<b class="">To:</b> Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>; Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX <<a href="mailto:raphael.beauregardlacroix@sciencespo.fr" target="_blank" class="">raphael.beauregardlacroix@<wbr class="">sciencespo.fr</a>><br class="">
<b class="">Cc:</b> ws2-jurisdiction <<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a>><br class="">
<b class="">Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CONSENSUS CALL ON NOTE 4.1 TEXTS: Almost Final Draft Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p>
</div>
</div><div class=""><div class="h5"><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt" class="">CSG supports “No change to the report”.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in" class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><b class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">From: </span></b><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">Ws2-jurisdiction <<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@<wbr class="">icann.org</a>> on behalf of Greg Shatan
<<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>><br class="">
<b class="">Date: </b>Friday, March 2, 2018 at 1:46 AM<br class="">
<b class="">To: </b>Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX <<a href="mailto:raphael.beauregardlacroix@sciencespo.fr" target="_blank" class="">raphael.beauregardlacroix@<wbr class="">sciencespo.fr</a>><br class="">
<b class="">Cc: </b>ws2-jurisdiction <<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a>><br class="">
<b class="">Subject: </b>[Ws2-jurisdiction] CONSENSUS CALL ON NOTE 4.1 TEXTS: Almost Final Draft Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><a name="m_-2230359216995242267__MailOriginalBody" class=""><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif" class=""></span></a><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">All,<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif" class=""></span></span><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">We need to come to consensus on how to
deal with the two proposed texts resulting from "Note 4.1." I've reviewed the captioning, chat, email list & draft to figure out the most appropriate way forward, and a clear result emerges. On this point only, I'm extending the deadline to
<b class="">20:00 UTC</b>. (Any other points, the deadline is still 18:00 UTC.)<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">The bottom line is this:
</span></span><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">Unless one or both texts ("as is" or with agreed modifications) emerges as a consensus choice (i.e.,
"a position where ... most agree") between now (06:30 UTC) and 20:00 UTC, neither text will be in the Draft Report.</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">
<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">Please quickly indicate your support for one of the following alternatives:</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">1. Support first proposal only.</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">2. Support second proposal only.</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">3. Support both proposals.</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">4. No change; neither text will be in the Report.</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class=""><br class="">
Thank you.</span></b></span><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">The draft report is attached in Word and PDF. In addition, I found it helpful to pull together a detailed timeline to best understand where we
are and how we got here. The long version of the timeline is attached. The chat and captioning are </span></span><a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=79434430" target="_blank" class=""><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">here</span></span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">The short version of the timeline is this:<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
<div class="">
<ul type="disc" class="">
<li class="MsoNormal">
<span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">We discussed Note 4.1 on the call. The objective was identified as "</span></span><span class="">showing the public that we took their
comments into account."</span><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""> We ran through various alternatives, which had little support and a few objections. I noted that nothing was jelling.</span></span><span class=""> <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">Based on the various alternatives I suggested a "middle ground." </span></span><span class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">There seemed to be support for this approach and I said "I think we can take that as the result of 4.1." There was no objection and we moved on to the rest of the call.</span></span><span class=""> <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">As the call was winding up, Thiago wrote in chat, "On the outstanding point 4.1, which is outstanding I understand, may I try to lend you a hand in finding that delicate
balance?" and provided some text. The first part was largely the same as text that was objected to earlier in the call; the second part was new. </span></span><span class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">The call was breaking up and there was no discussion of this suggestion, though
</span></span><span class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">Kavouss and Jorge supported it in the chat. We noted that the proposal</span></span><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class=""> could
be reviewed on the list.</span></span><span class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">In the Draft Report, I included both proposed texts -- the text I prepared based on the "middle ground" discussion in the group and the text that Thiago put in the chat.</span></span><span class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></li></ul>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">Procedurally, we are in a somewhat muddled position. First, this was not actually an outstanding point at the end of the call, so I was mistaken
in treating it as if it were. Second, while the Draft Report makes it look like both proposals could end up in the Report, the second suggestion (from the end of the call) was intended to be a replacement for the first one (identified as the "result of 4.1"
earlier in the call). </span><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">A hyper-technical view would be that the second suggestion was out of order and should not be considered. We would then have one suggestion and
life would be simpler. Another hyper-technical view would be that the suggestions were intended to be alternatives and must be treated as a "one or the other (or neither)" decision.</span><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">I think it's simpler (and less technical) to look at it this way: </span><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">We have two proposals. Both are possibilities. Neither text was really discussed on the call. The first text was based on a conceptual understanding
that seemed to get traction, but the text wasn't discussed. The second text was suggested at the very end of the call and wasn't discussed either. We have less than 24 hours before this Draft Report must be submitted, and it must be the consensus view of
the Subgroup. With this lack of consideration, neither text can claim to be the consensus view of the Subgroup and a "no objections" approach would be inappropriate.</span><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">As such, unless one or both texts
</span></b></span><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#222222;background:white" class="">("as is" or with agreed modifications) </span></b></span><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">emerges
as a consensus choice (i.e., "a position where ... most agree") between now (06:30 UTC) and 22:00 UTC, neither text will be in the Draft Report.</span></b><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">Please quickly indicate your support for one of the following alternatives:</span></b><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">1. Support first proposal only.</span></b><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">2. Support second proposal only.</span></b><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">3. Support both proposals.</span></b><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">4. No change; neither text will be in the Report.</span></b><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">Greg</span><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
</div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:07 PM Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX <</span><a href="mailto:raphael.beauregardlacroix@sciencespo.fr" target="_blank" class=""><span class="">raphael.beauregardlacroix@<wbr class="">sciencespo.fr</span><span class=""></span></a><span class="">>
wrote:<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt" class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Dear all,<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Would it be possible to keep both the first (generic) statement
<i class="">and </i>the second, more specific one? While it is slightly repetitive, the second can serve as an example to the first. <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Best,<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">2018-03-01 15:40 GMT+01:00 <</span><a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank" class=""><span class="">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</span><span class=""></span></a><span class="">>:<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt" class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="color:#1f497d" class="">Dear Greg and all,</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="color:#1f497d" class="">If I understand your email below correctly, and consistent with what was agreed yesterday, you are consulting
the list on the latest text that Thiago proposed on note 4.1, i.e. the following addition, right?:</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">
<span class="">“The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but
these comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other fora, had already been acknowledged”</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" style="color:#1f497d" class="">As said yesterday I have no objections to such an addition.</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" style="color:#1f497d" class="">Best regards</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="PT-BR" style="color:#1f497d" class="">Jorge
</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" style="color:#1f497d" class=""> </span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><b class=""><span lang="DE" class="">Von:</span></b></span><span class=""><span lang="DE" class=""> Ws2-jurisdiction [mailto:</span></span><a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank" class=""><span class=""><span lang="DE" class="">ws2-jurisdiction-<wbr class="">bounces@icann.org</span></span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><span lang="DE" class="">]
<b class="">Im Auftrag von </b>Greg Shatan<br class="">
<b class="">Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag, 1. März 2018 00:22<br class="">
<b class="">An:</b> ws2-jurisdiction <</span></span><a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank" class=""><span class=""><span lang="DE" class="">ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</span></span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><span lang="DE" class="">><br class="">
<b class="">Betreff:</b> [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: PLEASE REVIEW: Almost Final Draft Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""> <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""> <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""> <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">All,</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Attached in Word and PDF is the almost final Draft Report, based on today’s call. This is also available in Google Docs at
</span><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank" class=""><span class="">https://docs.google.com/<wbr class="">document/d/<wbr class="">1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_<wbr class="">3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?<wbr class="">usp=sharing</span><span class=""></span></a><span class="">.
</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Please review and comment. I have marked in the margin the sections corresponding to the “Notes” in the chart distributed before today’s
call.</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">In particular please review and respond to the suggested text on page 12 at the end of the “Overview of the Work of the Subgroup.”
There are two proposed additions that grew out of Note 4.1. The first received broad support on the call without noted objections.</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">The second received both support and objections on the call. Since there was no clear path forward from the call, it is important that
as many participants as possible give this careful consideration and provide their views on this second proposed addition. This text reads as follows:</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span class="">The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but
these comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other fora, had already been acknowledged.</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">I look forward to hearing from you all, with regard to the report as a whole and any specific aspects, in particular the proposed text
above.</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Since the final draft must be submitted no later than 23:59 UTC on 2 March, I am setting
<b class="">a deadline of 18:00 UTC on 2 March</b> for all responses.</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Thank you!</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Greg</span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""> </span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span class=""><br class="">
<span style="color:#999999" class="">______________________________<wbr class="">______________________________<wbr class="">_____</span>
<br class="">
</span><span class=""><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#999999" class="">This message is being sent from a Law Firm and may contain CONFIDENTIAL or PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not print, copy or
distribute this message or any attachments. Advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this message and attachments without retaining a copy.
</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class=""><span class=""><b class=""><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#666666" class="">Disclaimer</span></b></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p><p class=""><span class=""><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#666666" class="">The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and
others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.<br class="">
<br class="">
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by
<b class="">Mimecast Ltd</b>, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a
<b class="">safer</b> and <b class="">more useful</b> place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more
</span></span><a href="http://www.mimecast.com/products/" target="_blank" class=""><span class=""><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif" class="">Click Here</span></span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#666666" class="">.</span></span><span class=""><span lang="DE-CH" class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt" class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span class="">______________________________<wbr class="">_________________<br class="">
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br class="">
</span><a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank" class=""><span class="">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><br class="">
</span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" target="_blank" class=""><span class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr class="">listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><br class="">
<br clear="all" class="">
<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></span></p>
</div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">-- <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="">Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></span></p>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class=""></span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rapha%C3%ABl-beauregard-lacroix-88733786/" target="_blank" class=""><span class=""><span style="font-size:9.5pt" class="">LinkedIn</span></span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""><span style="font-size:9.5pt" class="">
- </span></span><a href="https://twitter.com/rbl0112" target="_blank" class=""><span class=""><span style="font-size:9.5pt" class="">@rbl0012</span></span><span class=""></span></a><span class=""></span><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br class="">______________________________<wbr class="">_________________<br class="">
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" class="">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr class="">listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br class="">
<br class=""></blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" class="">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>