<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Dear All<div>I have supported Thiago proposal as also supported by Jorge.</div><div>I therefore maintain my support </div><div>Regards </div><div>Kavouss<br><br><div id="AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 2 Mar 2018, at 07:45, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;display:inline">All,<br></div></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;display:inline"><br></div></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">We need to come to consensus on how to deal with the two proposed texts resulting from "Note 4.1." I've reviewed the captioning, chat, email list & draft to figure out the most appropriate way forward, and a clear result emerges. On this point only, I'm extending the deadline to <b>20:00 UTC</b>. (Any other points, the deadline is still 18:00 UTC.)</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">The bottom line is this:
<b style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">Unless one or both texts<span> </span><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">("as is" or with agreed modifications) </span>emerges as a consensus choice (i.e., "a position where ... most agree") between now (06:30 UTC) and 20:00 UTC, neither text will be in the Draft Report.</b>
</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><br></b></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">
<div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>Please quickly indicate your support for one of the following alternatives:</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b><br></b></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><b style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">1. Support first proposal only.</b><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>2. Support second proposal only.</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>3. Support both proposals.</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>4. No change; neither text will be in the Report.</b></span></div><br class="gmail-Apple-interchange-newline">
Thank you.</b></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">The draft report is attached in Word and PDF. In addition, I found it helpful to pull together a detailed timeline to best understand where we are and how we got here. The long version of the timeline is attached. The chat and captioning are <a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=79434430">here</a>.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">The short version of the timeline is this:</div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><ul style=""><li style=""><font face="verdana, sans-serif">We discussed Note 4.1 on the call. The objective was identified as "<span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">showing the public that we took their comments into account."</span> We ran through various alternatives, which had little support and a few objections. I noted that nothing was jelling.</font> </li><li style=""><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Based on the various alternatives I suggested a "middle ground." </font></li><li style=""><font face="verdana, sans-serif">There seemed to be support for this approach and I said "I think we can take that as the result of 4.1." There was no objection and we moved on to the rest of the call.</font> </li><li style=""><font face="verdana, sans-serif">As the call was winding up, Thiago wrote in chat, "On the outstanding point 4.1, which is outstanding I understand, may I try to lend you a hand in finding that delicate balance?" and provided some text. The first part was largely the same as text that was objected to earlier in the call; the second part was new. </font></li><li style=""><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">The call was breaking up and there was no discussion of this suggestion, though
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">Kavouss and Jorge supported it in the chat. We noted that the proposal</span> could be reviewed on the list.</span></li><li style=""><font face="verdana, sans-serif">In the Draft Report, I included both proposed texts -- the text I prepared based on the "middle ground" discussion in the group and the text that Thiago put in the chat.</font></li></ul></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Procedurally, we are in a somewhat muddled position. First, this was not actually an outstanding point at the end of the call, so I was mistaken in treating it as if it were. Second, while the Draft Report makes it look like both proposals could end up in the Report, the second suggestion (from the end of the call) was intended to be a replacement for the first one (identified as the "result of 4.1" earlier in the call). </span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">A hyper-technical view would be that the second suggestion was out of order and should not be considered. We would then have one suggestion and life would be simpler. Another hyper-technical view would be that the suggestions were intended to be alternatives and must be treated as a "one or the other (or neither)" decision.</span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I think it's simpler (and less technical) to look at it this way: </span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">We have two proposals. Both are possibilities. Neither text was really discussed on the call. The first text was based on a conceptual understanding that seemed to get traction, but the text wasn't discussed. The second text was suggested at the very end of the call and wasn't discussed either. We have less than 24 hours before this Draft Report must be submitted, and it must be the consensus view of the Subgroup. With this lack of consideration, n</span><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">either text can claim to be the consensus view of the Subgroup and a "no objections" approach would be inappropriate.</span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>As such, unless one or both texts
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">("as is" or with agreed modifications) </span>emerges as a consensus choice (i.e., "a position where ... most agree") between now (06:30 UTC) and 22:00 UTC, neither text will be in the Draft Report.</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b><br></b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>Please quickly indicate your support for one of the following alternatives:</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b><br></b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><b style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">1. Support first proposal only.</b><br></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>2. Support second proposal only.</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>3. Support both proposals.</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b>4. No change; neither text will be in the Report.</b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><b><br></b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</span></div><div class="gmail_default"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:07 PM Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX <<a href="mailto:raphael.beauregardlacroix@sciencespo.fr" target="_blank">raphael.beauregardlacroix@<wbr>sciencespo.fr</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>Dear all,</div><div><br></div><div>Would it be possible to keep both the first (generic) statement <i>and </i>the second, more specific one? While it is slightly repetitive, the second can serve as an example to the first. </div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2018-03-01 15:40 GMT+01:00 <span><<a href="mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" target="_blank">Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch</a>></span>:<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="DE-CH">
<div class="gmail-m_4256233862132668528m_1792400714005116926m_-7799487379781585504WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Dear Greg and all,</span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">If I understand your email below correctly, and consistent with what was agreed yesterday, you are consulting the list
on the latest text that Thiago proposed on note 4.1, i.e. the following addition, right?:</span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">“The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are
needed, in particular on jurisdictional immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but these comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for
“further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other fora, had already been acknowledged”</span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">As said yesterday I have no objections to such an addition.</span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Best regards</span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Jorge
</span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><span lang="PT-BR" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="DE" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Von:</span></b><span lang="DE" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> Ws2-jurisdiction [mailto:<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">ws2-jurisdiction-<wbr>bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>Im Auftrag von </b>Greg Shatan<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag, 1. März 2018 00:22<br>
<b>An:</b> ws2-jurisdiction <<a href="mailto:ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank">ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: PLEASE REVIEW: Almost Final Draft Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March<u></u><u></u></span></p><div><div class="gmail-m_4256233862132668528m_1792400714005116926h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">All,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Attached in Word and PDF is the almost final Draft Report, based on today’s call. This is also available in Google Docs at
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/<wbr>document/d/<wbr>1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_<wbr>3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?<wbr>usp=sharing</a>.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Please review and comment. I have marked in the margin the sections corresponding to the “Notes” in the chart distributed before today’s call.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In particular please review and respond to the suggested text on page 12 at the end of the “Overview of the Work of the Subgroup.” There are two proposed additions
that grew out of Note 4.1. The first received broad support on the call without noted objections.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The second received both support and objections on the call. Since there was no clear path forward from the call, it is important that as many participants as
possible give this careful consideration and provide their views on this second proposed addition. This text reads as follows:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt">
<span lang="EN-US">The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but these comments did not bring
any changes to the report, nor could they be considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other fora, had already been acknowledged.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I look forward to hearing from you all, with regard to the report as a whole and any specific aspects, in particular the proposed text above.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Since the final draft must be submitted no later than 23:59 UTC on 2 March, I am setting
<b>a deadline of 18:00 UTC on 2 March</b> for all responses.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Thank you!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Greg<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span lang="EN-US"><br>
<span style="color:rgb(153,153,153)">______________________________<wbr>______________________________<wbr>_____</span>
<br>
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt;color:rgb(153,153,153)">This message is being sent from a Law Firm and may contain CONFIDENTIAL or PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not print, copy or distribute this message or any attachments.
Advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this message and attachments without retaining a copy.
</span><span lang="EN-US"><br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,102)">Disclaimer</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,102)"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:rgb(102,102,102)">The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it.
If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.<br>
<br>
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by
<b>Mimecast Ltd</b>, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a
<b>safer</b> and <b>more useful</b> place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more
<a href="http://www.mimecast.com/products/" target="_blank">Click Here</a>.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br></blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org" target="_blank">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail-m_4256233862132668528m_1792400714005116926gmail_signature"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix<div><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rapha%C3%ABl-beauregard-lacroix-88733786/" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a><span style="font-size:12.8px"> - </span><a href="https://twitter.com/rbl0112" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">@rbl0012</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><Note 4.1 Timeline.docx></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Final Draft v1.2.7.docx></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Final Draft v1.2.7.pdf></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org">Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>