[Ws2-ombudsman] Next meeting - WS2 IOO DT | Meeting #12 | Monday, 22 November 2016 @ 05:00 UTC

[farzaneh badii]

Hi Sebastien

I think you mean we will have the meeting tomorrow, Tuesday 22 November at
5a.m. UTC and not tonight.

Is that correct?

Thanks

On 21 November 2016 at 18:24, Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
>
>
> This mail is to confirm our next call and to suggest an agenda.
>
>
>
> The call of the IOO DT will be a single topic:
>
> How to launch the review by external consultant of the IOO?
>
> And the consequences for our work and our team.
>
>
>
> The items will be
>
> ·      Roll Call / Apologies – Welcome – Opening Remarks
>
> ·      Discussion with legal staff
>
> ·      Discussion with procurement staff
>
> ·      Discussion with “reviews” staff
>
> ·      How to organize our team?
>
> ·      Next meeting #13 – 13UTC – Nov 28, 2016
>
> ·      AOB
>
>
>
> Please find the draft letter (I don’t have the final one) of the ccwg-WS2
> legal team that will trigger our discussion with ICANN legal staff.
>
>
>
> “ICANN Legal,
>
>
>
> Request for an opinion from CCWG-Accountability WS2:
>
> Background:
>
> The CCWG-Accountability WS2 Ombusman sub-group is working on recommending
> possible changes to the Office of the Ombudsman as required in the final
> report for WS1 of the CCWG-Accountability.
>
>
>
> Given the focus of this sub-group the group working on implementing ATRT2
> recommendations, which includes a requirement for an external review of the
> office of the Ombudsman, has proposed that the CCWG-Accountability WS2
> Ombudsman sub-group take on the responsibility for this evaluation which it
> has accepted to do with the agreement of the ccwg-WS2 plenary.
>
>
>
> The current ICANN Ombudsman Herb Waye and his predecessor are both members
> of the Ombudsman sub-group drafting team.
>
>
>
> Question:
>
> Is the current ICANN Ombusman (and his predecessor) placing himself
> (themselves) in a conflict of interest by participating in the sub-group
> which will have responsibility for the external review of the Office of the
> Ombudsman? If so what should the Ombudsman do to avoid such a conflict
> (completely recuse himself from all aspects or only from making or
> approving recommendations)?
>
>
>
> Leon Sanchez
>
> CCWG-Accountability Co-Chair.”
>
>
> Talk to you soon
>
> All the best
>
> SeB
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> +33 6 07 66 89 33
> Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
> Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-ombudsman mailing list
> Ws2-ombudsman at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-ombudsman
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-ombudsman/attachments/20161121/f4f31af9/attachment.html>