[Ws2-ombudsman] meeting schedules was Re: [] category discussion ...

[avri doria]

Hi,

Apologies, I mixed up two conversations and two meeting.

According to the Subsequent procedures schedule posted at:
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QLmUjQZB7x2ez74td4m5GC1q1pHeO5ke2ePpiy3gdG8/edit#gid=634050250>

We do not have any Subsequent Procedures meeting schedule for today.

Avri




On 22-May-17 13:06, Arasteh wrote:
> Dear Avri
> Tks again
> Pls kindly advise whether we gave meeting this evening at 20,00 hours 
> Regards 
> Kavouss  
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 15:35, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Kavouss
>>
>> ( I have added Jeff and Steve from the PDP WG leadership group to this
>> message thread.)
>>
>> While I will be suggesting that, it having been a year since we set our
>> meeting schedule to share the pain of uncomfortable times across
>> timezones, it is probably a good time for us to review our schedule and
>> see if there is consensus on changing it in any way.  This will be
>> discussed in the leadership group and expect it will be brought to the
>> full group in the near future.
>>
>>> On 18-May-17 00:35, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>> I do not agree to discuss this issue in any 03,00 UTC meeting as I
>>> will not be able to attend that meeting for the reasons given.
>> I understand that some meetings are at an uncomfortable time for some
>> segments of our WG membership.  That is understood in the principle of
>> "sharing the pain."  This is one reason why an issue is not discussed
>> just once, for list discussions and for the recordings and the
>> captioning.  I expect that even if we do find WG consensus on changing
>> our meeting rotation schedule, some of the times will be uncomfortable
>> for some of the members of the group.
>>
>> While I accept that some may not make all meetings, thus the need for
>> multiple passes at a subject, I have difficulty with the idea that any
>> issue would be excluded from a meeting because on the scheduling, except
>> in rare cases of an invited guest who cannot make a session. 
>> Personally, I think this would go against the principle of "sharing the
>> pain."
>>
>> Thanks
>> avri
>>
>>
>> BTW, please note that I have changed the subject line.  This is a
>> practice I suggest to others as something to do when responding to any
>> email, but responding to it in a different subject area.
>>
>>
>>> On 18-May-17 00:35, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>> Avri,
>>> Thank you very much for the message.
>>> I do not agree to discuss this issue in any 03,00 UTC meeting as I
>>> will not be able to attend that meeting for the reasons given.
>>> This must be discussed in full meeting in one of the evening sessions
>>> Regards
>>> Kavouss  
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>