[Ws2-so_ac] Draft transparency review for SOAC Subgroup Meeting # 18, on 26-Jan-2017

[matthew shears]

Thanks Steve - an straightforward and useful approach.

Matthew


On 26/01/2017 01:30, Steve DelBianco wrote:
> On our 19-Jan-2017 call, I offered to draft a review of one aspect of 
> accountability — *Transparency*:
>
>     Steve DelBianco:**Once we have described best practices, our "review" could identify AC/SOs coudl benefit from moving towards the best practices.   THAT could be our "recommendation.**that is, we compare each AC/SO against the Best Practices, and not against each other
>
>     Kavouss suggests a linear approach, ie take one question at a time in our next calls and analyze the responses to test the methodology,
>
>     If we do that, let's start with an easier question, e.g. Transparency.
>
>
> Attached is my 3-page draft review and recommendations 
> for transparency of each SOAC and subgroups that provided responses.
>
> Hope we can discuss on our next call.
>
> —Steve
>
>
> —
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/>
> +1.703.615.6206
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-so_ac mailing list
> Ws2-so_ac at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-so_ac

-- 
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-so_ac/attachments/20170126/5fa828a4/attachment.html>