Re: [lac-discuss-en] regarding election

To: "'Vanda Scartezini'" <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx>, <lac-discuss-es@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'LACRALO list'" <lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] regarding election
From: "Roosevelt King" <rok@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:15:05 -0400

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

If that is so, why did Lance end up being the sole nomination. So now you want 
to get others interested? I vehemently object. Lance did not lose the process 
and therefore there is no need to abandon it in favour of others who did not 
want the job in the first place, but now that the conspiracy has lost, you are 
demanding a new process? Seems to me that you must win by hook or crook.

 

ROK

 

From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vanda 
Scartezini
Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2015 12:06
To: lac-discuss-es@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LACRALO list
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] regarding election
Importance: High

 

 Whatever the accounting is my view is that restarting this process , calling 
for nominations, is the best way to guarantee we will follow a total legal 
process without any question. 

Maybe other colleagues also think in this opportunity to be part of ALAC and 
join the election.

  Best to all

 

Cualquiera sea el resultado , en mi opinion lo mejor que hacemos es empezar 
nuevamente esto proceso, para garantizar que lo hacemos en total seguimiento de 
las reglas sin cualquiera cuestiÃn.

Pienso que quizÃ otros colegas tambiÃn vuelvan a analisar la oportunidad que es 
estar en el ALC y participen de la election.

Abrazos a todos 

 

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 

Sorry for any typos.

_______________________________________________