[lac-discuss-en] Motion´s Alejandro Pisanty
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
Dear all
On August 18th 2015, Jacqueline Morris proposed an amendment to the motion
presented by Alejandro Pisanty.
The amendment is as follows:
" Each LACRALO monthly teleconference should (not must) include adequate
time on the agenda for discussion of substantive policy issues, especially
current ICANN public consultations. If this is not on the agenda, the
Secretariat should explain the rationale at least 1 week before the
teleconference. (Acceptable reasons are other urgent business, special
guests or special topic meetings, for example)"
Alejandro Pisanty agrees to accept this amendment and withdraw his motion so
we can focus on substantive issues.
We think that being the comments regarding Alejandro Pisanty dealt with
and seeing agreement on this proposal, there is consensus about this
motion.
See page:
<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54692654>
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54692654
Therefore, we understand that there is consensus (synonymous of general
agreement referred to in Article 12.8 of RoPs), unless there is significant
opposition which would require a vote on this issue. The timeframe to issue
opinions against this decisión is 7 days counted from the time this email is
sent.
With this email we cancel the vote on Alejandro Pisanty's motion and
consider as agreed by consensus the wording proposed by Jacqueline
Morris.
Regards
Alberto Soto
---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________