Re: [lac-discuss-en] = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????

Thank you Jacqueline,

for the benefit of future generation, lets have the whole history well 
documented against rules and agreements existing at the time of each election. 
It would be a most useful exercise in the discussion about new rules if 
necessary.


Carlos RaÃl GutiÃrrez
_____________________

email: crg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: carlos.raulg
+506 8837 7173 (cel)
+506 4000 2000 (home)
+506 2290 3678 (fax)
_____________________
Apartado 1571-1000
San Jose, COSTA RICA







> On Jul 29, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I think there's some confusion. We have had a couple of consensus polls, in 
> 2008 it was an objection to a single nomination, as it is here.
> In the other cases, it was because the teleconference was not quorate, and 
> the list is a quorum, so the consensus poll was done to ensure that the 
> decision was quorate. These cases are different on the face, and so should 
> not serve as precedent for this case.
> The only precedent to be considered should be the 2008 one.
> Sincerely
> Jacqueline Morris
> 
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. 
> (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, <asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
> 
>  Subject: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????
>  From: asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>  Dear, this is part of the mail where porqudel process explicel
>  Voting:
> 
> 
>  Now I want to remind you that last year we were Humberto and I, mechanics
>  applicants. We should do votaciny accept the result. There were those who
>  voted no, others abstained and others voted yes.
> 
> 
>  The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, unique candidate for ALAC
>  Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent.
> 
> 
>  Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need
>  make choice for that position.
> 
> 
>  We pre-meeting with the staff and then taken the decision
>  Lance was advised that the ballot will be made, taking as a precedent the 
> case
>  Natalia Enciso.
> 
> 
>  ARE ongoing process and finalizarcon the ballot.
> 
> 
>  This is the mail sent before the end of the votaciny on which
>  no prior knowledge recibiningn comment is the result:
> 
> 
>  Before the results of the current survey on whether or not
>  Lance Hinds should be confirmed as the ALAC Representative 2015-2017
>  LACRALO would like us to establish the methodology to be utilizarpara
>  determine the results.
> 
> 
>  Whether a majority (over 50%) of the respondents to the
>  survey, not counting abstentions indicated NO, then the process
>  of selection of the seat currently occupied by Ftima ALAC Cambronero
>  reiniciarcon a new call for applications.
> 
> 
>  Otherwise, the appointment of Lance Hinds is confirmed as LACRALO
>  ALAC member for 2015-2017.
> 
> 
>  Remember that each RALO ALAC should choose its Member; thus
>  we have made a choice according explained, taking three background
>  Similar and applications for several members that were conducted in the
>  meeting in Buenos Aires, who felt that the process was
>  incomplete.
> 
> 
>  In the interest of transparency, we reported before the result of the
>  Voting next steps.
> 
> 
>  In this regard we believe that it has complied with the report and why
>  It corresponds to open a new period of postulacin, presentaciny ballot.
> 
> 
>  It is worth remembering that there are many situations that do not expressly 
> estn
>  regulated as quisiramos. We must adopt a position basndonos
>  in the rules and precedents that have. When there is a situation
>  expressly regulated, we must choose one of the alternatives, reporting
>  prior to the community.
> 
> 
>  This is rational only solution we have found to solve this
>  such drawbacks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  best regards
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Alberto Soto
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  ---
>  Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
>  http://www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1a1613a0f7.html 
> <http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1a1613a0f7.html>
> --]]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en 
> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en


_______________________________________________