Re: [lac-discuss-en] REMINDER VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT (EN): LACRALO Motion on the ALAC Statement on KSK Rollover

<!--
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline}
span.EmailStyle17
        {font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext}
span.EmailStyle18
        {font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext}
span.EmailStyle19
        {font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext}
span.msoIns
        {text-decoration:underline;
        color:teal}
.MsoChpDefault
        {font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
        {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
-->
 
 *** Reminder that the vote closes on Monday, April 30 at 23 UTC. ***
  
 Dear All,
  
 On behalf of the leaders of LACRALO we are launching the next vote from 
Wednesday, April 25 to Monday, April 30, at 23 UTC.
  
 Alejandro Pisanty's motion says:
  
 Colleagues,
  
 In  ALAC Statement on the KSK Rollover you can see what the ALAC will put to 
the vote to express the opinion of the users about the KSK process, which as we 
all know is the rotation of the &quot;keys&quot; of the PKI system (public key 
cryptography) of the DNSSEC system that protects the system of domain names 
(DNS) against some significant attacks.
  
 The text does not include the proposal that we made here in LACRALO that the 
ALSes assume a role in the dissemination of this process among ISPs, other 
providers, civil society, technical community and governments within our reach. 
Moreover, said text was included in a preliminary version and eliminated in the 
final. Eliminating the co-responsibility of the ALS puts us again in the role 
of petitioners who do not contribute with their own decision to the security, 
stability and robustness of the DNS, the primary responsibility of ICANN.
  
 For this reason, I call on our ALAC representatives to insist on the inclusion 
of this text and, if it is not achieved, vote against the approval of the 
proposed text. Consider this proposal as a formal motion and proceed in 
abbreviated time so that it can be decided before the ALAC vote. If these times 
are not possible, be ex post-facto as a protest.
  
 Are you in agreement with the motion presented by Mr. Alejandro Pisanty?
 YES
 NO
   
 The voting process will be governed by  Articles 12 (especially 12.8), 19 and 
20 of the Rules of Procedure. 
  
 Kind Regards,
  
 ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community  E-mail: 
staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Website: atlarge.icann.org   Facebook: 
facebook.com/icannatlarge  Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge  <image001.png>
  
   
_______________________________________________  lac-discuss-en mailing list  
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en  
  
   
_______________________________________________  lac-discuss-en mailing list  
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en