Re: [lac-discuss-en] [At-Large] The Case for Regulatory Capture at ICANN | Review Signal Blog

[Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

But why?  Any back-of-the-envelope calculation for TLDs such as .com or 
.org strongly suggests that the existing registry fee levels are 
dramatically too high - and cumulate well past a $billion a year in 
monopoly rents far in excess of actual costs.

Running a registry is largely a back room operation - some database 
transaction servers and a cloud of actual DNS name servers.

Since ICANN was formed the cost of those things has fallen and fallen 
and fallen.  And the cost of much of the infrastructure - such as 
Verisign's fortress data center(s) have been amortized years ago.

As far as I know there has never been an audit, much less a serious 
audit that distinguishes between real operational costs and Potemkin 
Village corporate image fluff costs, of actual costs of providing legacy 
TLD registry services.

One would think that an audit - published to the public - would be 
warranted before any consideration of unleashing unbounded upwards 
prices onto captive legacy TLD users?

        --karl--
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your 
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with 
the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website 
Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman 
link above to change your membership status or configuration, including 
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether 
(e.g., for a vacation), and so on.