As you insist, of course this will be passed on as
relevant. Unfortunately, it being a working group of ALL RALOs and
not just LACRALO, I cannot say that the rest of the group will
agree with the LACRALO viewpoint. This is, after all, a WG to create
criteria to be applied globally.
And of course, I am thrilled that other members of LACRALO will be
participating and following the work.
Jacqueline
On 2 Aug 2015 23:15, <<mailto:jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx>jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N =
- = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
From: <mailto:jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx>jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx
Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching.
We insist on it.
Cordially
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty@xxxxxxxxx>apisanty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your
question is relevant to the community:
>
>
> June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24
hours (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline
Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
>
>
> "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief
discussion on metrics.
>
>
> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This
is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
self-interest to distort the discussion.
>
>
> What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves.
Individuals and organizations working activametne must be
identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or
participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer
counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of
organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the
will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a
representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work
that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>
>
> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable,
and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite
clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute,
the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of
10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their
participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of
the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of
certificates, which must institute.
>
>
> There is a classification of units that can help us further in
this process:
>
>
> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and
contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are
incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
>
>
> 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues
Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>
>
> 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make
presence" for elections and selection processes for equity
participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
>
>
> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage
those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
>
>
> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working
Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable
and achievable. "
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas
<<mailto:jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx>jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx> :
>
> Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It
considered helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
>
> Sent from my Huawei Mobile
>
> Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty@xxxxxxxxx>apisanty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
>
>
> The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus
that we out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria
for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
>
>
> I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM,
<<mailto:jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
>
> Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N
= - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
> From: <mailto:jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the
> WG.
> Jacqueline
>
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible,
> Free.(After Chris Lehmann
<<http://twitter.com/chrislehmann>http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>
>
> The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM
<<mailto:asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> [[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
>>
>> ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = =
>> Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
>> From: <mailto:asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>asoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above
>> Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacqueline Morris
>>
>>
>> - Juan Manuel Rojas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be
>> Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and
schedule the
>> Meeting.
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Alberto Soto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses.
>> <Http://www.avast.com>Http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
[[--Original text (es)
<http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html>http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html
--]]
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
<mailto:lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en