Dear all
If it was proposed on July 20th in the meeting, why was it only posted
to the list as a motion over a week later? Some of us work and cannot
attend the meetings at the proposed time. The list acts as the virtual
GA.
I'd like to request a hold on the poll for the 2 weeks per rule 11.2
so that all of us have the requisite 2 weeks to consider the motion,
and any points of order thereof.
Sincerely
Jacqueline Morris
Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Humberto Carrasco
<hcarrascob@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:hcarrascob@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear Dev,
Your quotation is right. However, the same rule says, "As a
general rule", which means that there is an exception. It is true
that we did not wait 2 weeks. The reason is because Alejandro
Pisanty proposed this resolution the 20th of July in our general
meeting with translation in English, Spanish and Portuguese. We
understood that the proposal had been known for a significant
number of members of LACRALO on day 20th of July. Also, the
proposal does not seem to be a complex motion that requires
detailed analysis. Therefore, we used the exceptional power to
vote on this motion without waiting the two weeks period.
In any case, we will put the motion for comments as you requested
on the wiki.
Regards
El 29/07/2015 a las 11:56 a.m., Dev Anand Teelucksingh escribiÃ:
I'm continue to be very disappointed at Alberto Soto and Humberto
Carassco in the performance of their duties as chair and secretariat.
As per Rule 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or
amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has
been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than
two weeks, to all participants in the working languages of the
Assembly.
THIS WAS NOT DONE.
Can be motion be put on the wiki for comment? I'll comment on the
motion there, since there is an amendment I'll suggest.
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:00 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff
<staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
== EN ==
Dear All,
Do you support Mr. Alejandro Pisantyâs motion? Formal Motion
from Alejandro Pisanty:
a. LACRALOâs Chair and Secretariat shall do an Agenda with
policy issues for discussion.
b. The first 30 minutes of each monthly call shall be focused
on debate of current ICANN public consultations.
* Yes
* No
* Abstain
== ES ==
Hola a todos,
ÂUsted apoya la mociÃn de Alejandro Pisanty?
a. que la Presidencia y la SecretarÃa hagan una agenda de
temas de polÃticas para su discusiÃn
b. que los primeros 30' de cada sesiÃn mensual se dediquen a
temas sustantivos de debate de polÃticas en curso en
consultas pÃblicas de ICANN
*Si
*No
*AbstenciÃn
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber,
Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann
<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge
<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en