Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Dear Alejandro,

thanks for your kind note. Which draft are you speaking about? The
Westlake draft or the ALAC Statement draft?
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 03/08/2015 20:44, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch wrote:
> Olivier,
>
> I find the draft lacking in understanding the necessary tensions in
> the non-commercial space, and in not making an analysis of the effects
> of increasing structural complexity on the GNSO in general. 
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>  
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
>  
>
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Desde:* lac-discuss-en-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [lac-discuss-en-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] en nombre de Olivier
> MJ Crepin-Leblond [ocl@xxxxxxx]
> *Enviado el:* lunes, 03 de agosto de 2015 08:43
> *Hasta:* lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *CC:* Vanda Scartezini
> *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement
> on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
>
> Hello all,
>
> let me make this quite clear from the outset: ALAC members are asked
> to vote on the Statement, not on the GNSO Review Report. The ALAC
> Statement mentions the points it agrees with in the GNSO Review
> report. It mentions the points it does not agree with and is pretty
> strong on criticising the Consultants about the fact it completely
> missed the opportunity to evaluate the GNSO Structure. The ALAC
> response is pretty clear about that.
> The call for comments was made on 15 July. The only ALAC member from
> LAC that commented was Vanda and her views were taken into account.
> The only other LACRALO member that commented was Carlton Samuels and
> his views were also taken into account.
>
> In formulating the ALAC response, I unfortunately received no other
> input from LACRALO members, despite requests for feedback.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 03/08/2015 15:18, cveraq@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>>  Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: 
>> Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization 
>>  From: cveraq@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>  Vanda: if you say "I intend to vote in Please though I personally 
>> believe, and HAD Such statement made, That the review itself was really weak 
>> and did not touch Relevant several points." 
>>
>>
>>  It sounds contradictory and the vote should be against? 
>>
>>
>>  Carlos Vera Quintana 
>>  0988141143 
>>  Sguemecveraq 
>>
>>
>>> El 2/8/2015, a las 19:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>>>
>>> I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such 
>>> statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several 
>>> relevant points. 
>> [[--Original text (es)
>> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e497ab67c.html
>> --]]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

_______________________________________________