Re: [lac-discuss-en] [At-Large] - Price caps - was: The Case for Regulatory Capture at ICANN | Review Signal Blog

On June 28, 2019 at 11:48 morej1@xxxxxxx (John More) wrote:
 > +1 
 > 
 > Domain name speculation is very destructive since it requires potential users
 > who have real businesses or needs to jump through hoops and often be blocked
 > from a reasonable domain name.

We (i.e., ICANN) have enabled registries to do this ("premium
domains") with nTLDs.

The counter-argument is that the usual situation is just a fair market
price for the domain. How else do you decide who gets it?

I was jarred once, mildly, when a sunrise registration went from about
$150 (maybe less) to $20,000 because I was about 10 minutes late,
sunrise had expired.

I passed, it was of little value to me beyond that $150.

But that's hardly a "fair market price".

Four years later it's still listed by the registry as a "platinum
domain" (i.e., unsold.)

The fish rots from the head.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@xxxxxxxxxxxx             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your 
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with 
the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website 
Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman 
link above to change your membership status or configuration, including 
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether 
(e.g., for a vacation), and so on.