Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] FW: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

Vanda, coincido con Alejandro. AdemÃs coincido con una observaciÃn hecha por 
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:

âFor example, recommendation #23, approving new GNSO Constituencies. (and other 
new GNSO Constituency recommendations)

I am concerned about the creation of more Constituencies, all of which might 
probably end up in the Non-Contracted Party House, thus further fragmenting the 
Non-Contracted Party House and increasing tension between Constituencies. We 
all know about the tension between NCUC and NPOC. Having more Consituencies 
might only continue to strengthen the Contracted Party House since their vote 
will be more homogeneous and they will be able to "pick and mix" within the 
Non-Contracted Party House in order to obtain a majority.

Finally, I am very concerned that none of the recommendations address the wider 
malaise about the balance of power in the GNSO and the potential for capture 
caused by a fragmented Non-Contracted Party House and a solid Contracted Party 
House. We keep on hearing "the GNSO is broken and needs to be reformed" and yet 
there is not one line in the report that actually investigates the validity of 
this assertion. I see this as an opportunity missed.â



Las diferencias entre NCUC y NPOC cada vez son mas notorias,y realmente 
incrementar esto, serÃa arriesgado. Y no corregirlo, una oportunidad perdida.

Saludos cordiales



Alberto Soto





De: lac-discuss-es-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Alejandro 
Pisanty
Enviado el: domingo, 02 de agosto de 2015 09:40 p.m.
Para: Vanda Scartezini <vanda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: LACRALO list <lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
lac-discuss-es@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] FW: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC 
Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting 
Organization



Vanda,



las fallas del informe, hasta donde he podido identificarlas, son importantes. 
Tengamos el valor de votar en contra y hagamos que el trabajo sea bien 
terminado.



Alejandro Pisanty



On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:vanda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:

Dear all,

 A vote is calling in ALAC on the propose of ratification of the ALAC draft 
statement on GNSO review ( see email below) , some of us just contribute. 

 I need to vote till next Thursday. Please, if someone has any position against 
please not posted on public comment that will demand a change on my vote, 
please make it public.

If none I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made 
such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch 
several relevant points.  Due the huge involvement of GNSO on the new gTLDs 
during such review I believe the time frame was not opportune. For the same 
reason I was in favor to postpone ALAC review to leave IANA stewardship 
transition to finish and we could pay all our attention on such  review.

Appreciate any feedback.





Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464

Sorry for any typos.





From: <alac-announce-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:alac-announce-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > on behalf of ICANN 
Staff
Reply-To: ICANN Staff
Date: Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 09:00
To: "alac-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:alac-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "
Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: 
Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization



Dear All,



Alan Greenberg, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by the ALAC on 
the proposed ratification of a draft ALAC Statement in response to a public 
comment request. Please note that only the 15 ALAC members will cast votes in 
this poll.



*****

Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Draft 
Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization 
<https://community.icann.org/x/35U0Aw> " for the communication to relevant 
parties?

*****



Please note that the poll will be open from 01-August-2015 12:00 UTC to 
06-August-2015 12:00 UTC.



Regards,



Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine 
and Terri Agnew

ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC

E-mail: staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> 
atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>

Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> ICANNAtLarge 
<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list 
ALAC-Announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:ALAC-Announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large 
Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org


_______________________________________________