Yes mam, this is indeed the key strategic implication from the IRP.
In my own view however, ALAC [re]action may be premature for objective.
Recent developments, especially this empowered community model, has
already undermined the "GAC advises, Board follows" scheme. I see
this IRP decision as adding grist to the mill in any downstream
federal court action. If and when a federal district court makes
that pronouncement, then stick a fork in it. It is roasted.
-Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Jacqueline Morris
<<mailto:jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But to me, far more important in the long term is the very clear
rejection of "the GAC advises, the Board follows" model. The ruling
has chipped away at the power of the GAC "advice" , and may change
the dynamic of the stakeholder roles in ICANN.
Might this be an opportunity for At-Large to work towards balancing
the roles of the ACs? Given that the relationship with the Board is
different for the various ACs, based on the bye-laws.
Jacqueline
On 18 Jul 2017 11:38, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh"
<<mailto:devtee@xxxxxxxxx>devtee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IRP decision:
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-amazon-final-declaration-11jul17-en.pdf>https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-amazon-final-declaration-11jul17-en.pdf
Dev Anand
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Carlton Samuels
<<mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adds to the kerfuffle surrounding geographic names in the DNS.
>
>
<http://domainnamewire.com/2017/07/18/amazon-com-gets-big-win-domain-battle-may-yet-get-amazon-domain/>http://domainnamewire.com/2017/07/18/amazon-com-gets-big-win-domain-battle-may-yet-get-amazon-domain/
>
>
> -Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: <tel:876-818-1799>876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> <mailto:ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
>
<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
<mailto:lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;DM5PR03MB2714;27:CMV/fUuyPTmq0Go815gG9Jsumao2rNupQ1hHg8i+Lus2/PvqCJ6fRkdd721Nv0JyhCSB+/f6N7KrW6IeMKVb3I5D/VBtvPUjfPyyAsMaGm2AS967yrO0mYdb6LoJPOeebnbXvRHoWrLJeGkpMbM0ww==
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(750103)(520002050)(400001001223)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en mailing list
lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en