Re: [lac-discuss-en] [ALAC] IO recommends .amazon reconsideration

But to me, far more important in the long term is the very clear rejection
of "the GAC advises, the Board follows" model. The ruling has chipped away
at the power of the GAC "advice" , and may change the dynamic of the
stakeholder roles in ICANN.
Might this be an opportunity for At-Large to work towards balancing the
roles of the ACs? Given that the relationship with the Board is different
for the various ACs, based on the bye-laws.
Jacqueline

On 18 Jul 2017 11:38, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The IRP decision:
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irp-amazon-
> final-declaration-11jul17-en.pdf
>
> Dev Anand
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Carlton Samuels
> <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Adds to the kerfuffle surrounding geographic names in the DNS.
> >
> > http://domainnamewire.com/2017/07/18/amazon-com-gets-
> big-win-domain-battle-may-yet-get-amazon-domain/
> >
> >
> > -Carlton
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> > =============================
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> >
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > ALAC Working Wiki:
> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>

_______________________________________________