Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / Voto de LACRALO sobre la Mocion propuesta por Alejandro Pisanty

Dear all
If it was proposed on July 20th in the meeting, why was it only posted to
the list as a motion over a week later? Some of us work and cannot attend
the meetings at the proposed time. The list acts as the virtual GA.
I'd like to request a hold on the poll for the 2 weeks per rule 11.2 so
that all of us have the requisite 2 weeks to consider the motion, and any
points of order thereof.
Sincerely
Jacqueline Morris

Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>  Dear Dev,
>
> Your quotation is right. However, the same rule says, "As a general rule",
> which means that there is an exception. It is true that we did not wait 2
> weeks. The reason is because Alejandro Pisanty proposed this resolution the
> 20th of July in our general meeting with translation in English, Spanish
> and Portuguese.  We understood that the proposal had been known for a
> significant number of members of LACRALO on day 20th of July. Also, the
> proposal does not seem to be a complex motion that requires detailed
> analysis. Therefore, we used the exceptional power to vote on this motion
> without waiting the two weeks period.
>
> In any case, we will put the motion for comments as you requested on the
> wiki.
>
> Regards
>
>
> El 29/07/2015 a las 11:56 a.m., Dev Anand Teelucksingh escribiÃ:
>
>  I'm continue to be very disappointed at Alberto Soto and Humberto
> Carassco in the performance of their duties as chair and secretariat.
>
> As per Rule 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall
> be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently
> in advance, but in no case less than two weeks, to all participants in the
> working languages of the Assembly.
>
>  THIS WAS NOT DONE.
>
> Can be motion be put on the wiki for comment? I'll comment on the motion
> there, since there is an amendment I'll suggest.
>
>  Kind Regards,
>
>  Dev Anand
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:00 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff <
> staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>   == EN ==
>>
>>  Dear All,
>>
>>  Do you support Mr. Alejandro Pisantyâs motion? Formal Motion from
>> Alejandro Pisanty:
>>
>>  a. LACRALOâs Chair and Secretariat shall do an Agenda with policy
>> issues for discussion.
>> b. The first 30 minutes of each monthly call shall be focused on debate
>> of current ICANN public consultations.
>>
>> * Yes
>> * No
>> * Abstain
>>
>>  == ES ==
>>
>>  Hola a todos,
>>
>>  ÂUsted apoya la mociÃn de Alejandro Pisanty?
>>
>>  a. que la Presidencia y la SecretarÃa hagan una agenda de temas de
>> polÃticas para su discusiÃn
>> b. que los primeros 30' de cada sesiÃn mensual se dediquen a temas
>> sustantivos de debate de polÃticas en curso en consultas pÃblicas de ICANN
>>
>>  *Si
>> *No
>> *AbstenciÃn
>>
>>    Regards,
>>
>>  Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>> E-mail: staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
>> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing 
> listlac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>

_______________________________________________