I participated in this morning's call and wanted to level the
playing field by enunciating some principles and a framework for our
discussions.
Let's start with some principles.
1) The At-Large is a volunteer-led and fueled organisation and
whatever we do MUST be informed by unassailable facts we know of
voluntary organisations plus the psychology of voluntarism.
2) Individuals make the worthwhile contributions, not organisations.
3) There is a wide range of motivations for voluntarily contributing
and these must be fed for sustaining worthwhile contributions
4) Results matter but volunteer contributions across the board shall
always be uneven
So now, the framework for discussions. There are structural issues
as well as political issues that must be embraced for any viable
solution to emerge. The ICANN/RALO MOU is the source of the first
structurally-generated challenge.
While it recognizes individuals as the providers of policy advice,
it locates individual actions in organisations called ALS. And by so
doing suggests that value be given to the organisation. Some RALOs,
like NARALO, have developed rules that recognize individual
contributions but have shoehorned valuation for contribution into an
ALS structure. I'm not now sure what the answer should be but I
know what we now have is not fit to purpose and objective.
Another structural issue. An individual coming to the ICANN policy
development ecosystem is going to become a worthwhile contributor by
virtue of mental acumen, penchant for hard work and time in place.
Time in place is the common criteria for success. So current
arrangements give extra value to experienced volunteers.
At the same time, new blood is required to sustain the flow of
worthwhile contributors. Here's the thing. Face-to-Face (f2f) ICANN
meetings are the best platforms to learn and to become familiarized
with this complex beast called the ICANN ecosystem.
The effectiveness of a volunteer in policy development is directly
related to serial opportunity to participate in ICANN f2f
meetings. It is no accident that the most impactful groups in ICANN
are a) those that get to f2f meetings as 'volunteers' engaged in
compensated work b) Those who have the wherewithal to self-fund
attendance at ICANN f2f meetings.
The task is to develop a framework that strikes a balance which
takes into account the need for experienced volunteers with capacity
to deliver worthwhile contributions even as we build capacity in
newer less-experienced volunteers to sustain the At-Large participation agenda.
The current funding model for attendance of At-Large volunteers to
ICANN f2f meetings assist ALAC representatives, liaisons from ALAC
to qualified SOs/ACs plus named RALO leadership. This construct
seemingly presumes a direct line of inheritance from RALO leadership
thru ALAC representation. We know it is a presumption without merit,
especially if worthwhile contributions to policy discussions is the
objective for the At-Large in ICANN.
It is always wrong to think of travel funding to ICANN f2f meeting
as a benefit to a volunteer! It is not and cannot be!
ALAC representation compels attending three (3) f2f meetings per
annum. They are coincident with the ICANN meetings. In this
context, travel funding is purely part of the infrastructural cost
to fulfill an obligation. Otherwise it is like working for a company
that has business far removed from my place of domicile and expect
performance without provisioning the tools that enable that performance.
It rankles me personally when my contributions in both time and
treasure to the ICANN enterprise is neither accounted or
valorized. Then insult is added to my injury when some goof equates
a trip sitting in steerage for upwards of 17+ hours [the flight time
from Chicago to New Delhi] as a benefit!
I travel by air a lot for work; the miles are now counted in
millions. In the years I sat as an ALAC member + the incumbent
Secretariat for LACRALO and as a senior staffer at The University of
the West Indies, I contributed my vacation time of 3 weeks to ICANN
for attending f2f meetings. This does not count the average 20+
hours per week I normally dedicate to ICANN matters. Nor my personal
spend of a minimum of US$500 to attend said meetings! These all
contribute to ICANN having a real opportunity to record it is indeed
multi-stakeholder, is fulfilling its AoC obligations and has
contributions from end user representatives to its policy development.
Back in time, I was roundly criticised by some of my At-Large
colleagues for my position in dealing with so-called ALAC
'tourists'. This matter came to the top in India; LACRALO
representatives to ALAC were accused of abandoning ALAC business for
a tour of Indian tourist sites. This still haunts the At-Large in
ICANN circles. My firm stand against any sanctions or additional
criteria applied for travel support funding was interpreted as
'protecting' the members accused from sanctions for inattention to
duty. That was never my objective and it still is not the case
today. I just cannot accept the notion that travel funding is a
benefit to the volunteer. I shall, on principle, oppose any such
notion, howsoever derived or configured.
Finally, in the chat we heard talk of a 'reviewer' being appointed.
While the roles and responsibilities of such a person/actor is not
yet outlined, let us be clear to ring fence and give specific
instructions as to what we are trying to achieve here. We must
recognize from principles that volunteers give as much as they can
to the cause. The contributions in time and treasure of a Olivier
Crepin-Leblond or Cheryl Langdon Orr cannot be used as a benchmark
for either engagement or indeed, worthwhile contributions.
Best,
-Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)