Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT (ES): Votar en 2019 LACRALO Elecciones y Principios Operativos
- To: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT (ES): Votar en 2019 LACRALO Elecciones y Principios Operativos
- From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 01:49:49 -0400
Dear Humberto,
As Carlton has said, there is no retroactivity being applied. The terms of the
chair, secretariat and an ALAC member's terms are ending in 2019 under our
previous OP. With the new OP, new positions and new terms for the chair and
secretary and the new positions apply from now on.
As you have stated, your proposal is to have a person in region D to be chair
for a further two years and a person from region B be secretary for a further
two years. Your proposal offers the current chair and secretariat to be chair
and secretariat for three years in all.
I do not understand the rationale in picking the chair elect and secretary
elect from Region B and Region A respectively, nor the selection of another
ALAC member from Region C.
If I understood your proposal, if implemented it would mean that:
- one region will have both ALAC seats every other year.
- the Chair will be from region D for 5 years from 2018 to 2026.
- the secretary will be from region B for 5 years from 2018 up to 2024.
But I may have misunderstood. To prevent misunderstandings, I suggest that a
table be done showing how the terms of the positions and how the election cycle
would work for each year, up to 2026 so we all in LACRALO can fully understand.
I will do the same for "my" proposal also.
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:13 PM Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Friends, Through this email, I allow myself to make a proposal of what I
understand these elections should be. I do not agree in giving retroactivity
to the principle of rotation. This means that the current leaders (president
and secretary) will only be one year, instead of 2 years as established by the
new operating principles. This is a discrimination that has no basis. Nor do I
agree with the interpretation that Dev presents in its mail about what he
understands about the rotation principle. Devâ??s interpretation was not what
we talked about in Puerto Rico. According to my interpretation of the principle
of rotation, this should work in the following way and in order to explain my
point I will use my case as an example: When I finish my period as ALAC MEMBER
(2020), there will be elections for this position. My interpretation of the
principle of rotation has two consequences: 1.- A negative aspect: To choose
the person who assume the position of ALAC Member, this person cannot be from
the Andes sub region to which I belong. 2.- A positive aspect: For the next
election of Chair - vice-chair and secretary vice-secretary (2021) there is no
impediment that someone from the region of the Andes should run. For these
reasons, I would like to make the following proposal that starts from the
current positions and sub regions:
PROPOSAL * To start with the current leadership positions respecting the
principle of Non-Retroactivity of the Law. * Possibility that all current
leaders can be reelected. * New positions will be elected (vice Chair and vice
secretary). The proposal is the following:
PERÃ?ODO 2019 â?? 2021
CARGOS
REGIÃ?N
Chair
D: MERCOSUR
ElectedChair
B ANDES
Secretary
B: ANDES
Elected Secretary
A: CENTRAL
ALAC Member 1
C: CARIBE
Advised by LACRALO to serve within NOMCOM
C: CARIBE
ALAC Member appointed by NOMCOM
Member elected by NOMCOM
I suggest taking Dev's proposal and mine and submitting them to a vote of
LACRALO so that we can move forward.