[CCWG-ACCT] GAO meeting request

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Thu Apr 2 12:04:37 UTC 2015


As one of the initial suggester of recordings, I don't think it would still
be necessary. Based on the details that has been provided as to
intent/purpose of the meeting.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 2 Apr 2015 10:49, "Adebunmi AKINBO" <akinbo at nira.org.ng> wrote:

> Co-Chairs,
> Can we inform GAO of modification to record and transcribe discussion for
> us to generate more feedbacks and allow a selected or appointed observers ?
> Just a thought.
> -Akinbo.
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
>
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>
>> interesting, that.
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with recording, transcribing and then
>> agreeing on what was said, prior to publishing.  Gives even an
>> opportunity to correct mistakes...
>>
>>
>> I consider this NOT having dealt with my objection, and renew that
>> you do NOT have consensus.
>>
>>
>> el
>>
>> On 2015-04-02 09:46, Mathieu Weill wrote:
>> > Dear Roelof, all,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your valuable suggestions.  Good points we'll take
>> > onboard.
>> >
>> > The teleconference with the GAO is now set for April 7th.  The GAO
>> > was informed that our proposals were not finalized yet but
>> > preferred to maintain an earlier date because "This meeting is
>> > primarily intended to give us a chance to introduce ourselves and
>> > our work and to improve our understanding of the multistakeholder
>> > process."
>> >
>> > The GAO do not generally record calls or invite observers, so we
>> > will report to the group afterwards as planned.  Thertee should be
>> > an opportunity to provide written remarks after the call, as
>> > Roelof suggested.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Mathieu
>> >
>> > Le 01/04/2015 17:58, Roelof Meijer a écrit :
>> >> Dear Mathieu, all,
>> >>
>> >> Excellent approach, I would like to make two suggestions:
>> >>
>> >>  1. I (personally) would not like you to speak with GAO in your
>> >>     personal capacities, but formally, as co-chairs of the CCWG.
>> >>     You just have to put across that you are not (re-)presenting
>> >>     all the diverse opinions within the CCWG not giving the
>> >>     CCWG’s consensus opinion, but that does not have to mean
>> >>     you speak in a personal capacity
>> >>  2. To make sure that of those things you discussed, the really
>> >>     important ones cannot get lost or be misunderstood, put them
>> >>     in an email that you send to GAO afterwards (and cc it to
>> >>     this list)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> Roelof
>> [...]
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421             \     /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150402/6777adb9/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list