[CCWG-ACCT] GAO meeting request

Thu Apr 2 12:14:26 UTC 2015

Although our CCWG Chairs surely will know, just to note that the CWG already have gone through an GAO interview and hence could have some advice ready…

Jorge

Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Seun Ojedeji
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2015 14:05
An: Adebunmi AKINBO
Cc: Lisse Eberhard; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] GAO meeting request

As one of the initial suggester of recordings, I don't think it would still be necessary. Based on the details that has been provided as to intent/purpose of the meeting.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 2 Apr 2015 10:49, "Adebunmi AKINBO" <akinbo at nira.org.ng<mailto:akinbo at nira.org.ng>> wrote:
Co-Chairs,
Can we inform GAO of modification to record and transcribe discussion for us to generate more feedbacks and allow a selected or appointed observers ? Just a thought.
-Akinbo.

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na<mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
Dear Co-Chairs,

interesting, that.

There is nothing wrong with recording, transcribing and then
agreeing on what was said, prior to publishing.  Gives even an
opportunity to correct mistakes...

I consider this NOT having dealt with my objection, and renew that
you do NOT have consensus.

el

On 2015-04-02 09:46, Mathieu Weill wrote:
> Dear Roelof, all,
>
> Thanks for your valuable suggestions.  Good points we'll take
> onboard.
>
> The teleconference with the GAO is now set for April 7th.  The GAO
> was informed that our proposals were not finalized yet but
> preferred to maintain an earlier date because "This meeting is
> primarily intended to give us a chance to introduce ourselves and
> our work and to improve our understanding of the multistakeholder
> process."
>
> The GAO do not generally record calls or invite observers, so we
> will report to the group afterwards as planned.  Thertee should be
> an opportunity to provide written remarks after the call, as
> Roelof suggested.
>
> Best regards,
> Mathieu
>
> Le 01/04/2015 17:58, Roelof Meijer a écrit :
>> Dear Mathieu, all,
>>
>> Excellent approach, I would like to make two suggestions:
>>
>>  1. I (personally) would not like you to speak with GAO in your
>>     personal capacities, but formally, as co-chairs of the CCWG.
>>     You just have to put across that you are not (re-)presenting
>>     all the diverse opinions within the CCWG not giving the
>>     CCWG’s consensus opinion, but that does not have to mean
>>     you speak in a personal capacity
>>  2. To make sure that of those things you discussed, the really
>>     important ones cannot get lost or be misunderstood, put them
>>     in an email that you send to GAO afterwards (and cc it to
>>     this list)
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Roelof
[...]

--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA<mailto:el at lisse.NA>            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733<tel:%2B264%2081%20124%206733> (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150402/6c57c64c/attachment.html>